Thin sample this season. Corrie Ndaba has played 3 matches (178 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (61% of his 79 passes)
82% completion · 79× in 3/3 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
4.0 prog/90 · 10× in 3/3 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
3.5/90 · 7× in 3/3 matches
Signature: Receive → Break A Line → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); switch play — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
15 tracked carries (7.6/90, 0 progressive, 140m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.
progressivelateral/short% of his 15 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 19m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (15)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Beaten in the tackle
How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).
2
tackle duels
1
won
1
beaten · 50%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 50%
OUTSIDE 50%
Tackle-duel location — 1 inside · 1 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
1 · 50%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
1 · 50%
Vision AI beaten in 1 of 2 tackle duels (50% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →
He attempted only 0 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.
04
How does he create chances?
0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
02
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays inside from the left wing toward the left hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 passes worth 0.29 xT.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 36% of his 11 touches there are lost (4 times).
23 defensive actions across the season (11.6/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
2
tackles · 50% won
1
interceptions · 0.5/90
6
recoveries · 3.0/90
7
clearances · 3.5/90
3
blocks
32
avg action height
1
won high (att 3rd)
11
middle third
11
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by clearing and blocking — a reactive, protect-the-box profile. 9 proactive ball-wins (4.6/90), tackle success 50%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Lecce's output per match with Corrie Ndaba (3 matches) versus without him (5 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 5 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (3)
WITHOUT (5)
Δ
goals against /match
2.00
1.60
+0.40
points /match
1.00
1.20
-0.20
goals for /match
0.67
1.40
-0.73
xG for /match
1.40
1.21
+0.19
07
His Share of the Team
Of everything Lecce produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Corrie Ndaba specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
clearances
4%
47 / 1320
successful take-ons
3%
6 / 211
progressive passes
3%
46 / 1622
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 513 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Ball-playing centre-back37%Stopper centre-back18%
Why Ball-playing centre-back 37%: a weighted blend of progression 56 (weight 25%) + retention 42 (weight 30%) + press resistance 73 (weight 15%) + build-up 16 (weight 30%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Dribbling
97
Territory (wide vs central)
91
Crossing
80
Through-balls ~proxy
79
Press resistance ~proxy
73
Final-third threat
62
Progression
56
Line-breaking
43
Retention
42
Creativity
35
Passing directness
33
Defensive aggression
31
Carrying
26
Transition ~proxy
21
Ball-winning
19
Box threat
18
Receiving zones
16
Build-up
16
09
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 188 cm / 82 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Lorenzo De Silvestri Bologna · 186 cm / 84 kg
83%
Driven by: build-up (16%), transition (14%), territory (wide vs central) (11%). Different mechanism — Ndaba more via dribbling, passing directness; Silvestri more via creativity.
Warmed Omari Hamburg · Bundesliga · 188 cm / 74 kg
79%
Driven by: transition (15%), box threat (12%), dribbling (12%). Different mechanism — Ndaba more via final-third threat, progression; Omari more via build-up, ball-winning.
Zé Pedro Cagliari · 187 cm / 84 kg
78%
Driven by: dribbling (16%), territory (wide vs central) (15%), defensive aggression (11%). Different mechanism — Ndaba more via dribbling; Pedro more via build-up, line-breaking.
Enrico Delprato Parma Calcio 1913 · 183 cm / 76 kg
76%
Driven by: transition (17%), build-up (15%), ball-winning (12%). Different mechanism — Ndaba more via passing directness, dribbling; Delprato more via box threat, receiving zones.
Mark McKenzie Toulouse · Ligue 1 · 184 cm / 84 kg
75%
Driven by: build-up (14%), crossing (12%), box threat (11%). Different mechanism — Ndaba more via dribbling; McKenzie more via passing directness, ball-winning.
Alessandro Marcandalli Genoa · 195 cm / 80 kg
73%
Driven by: ball-winning (17%), build-up (15%), territory (wide vs central) (14%). Different mechanism — Ndaba more via dribbling, press resistance; Marcandalli more via carrying.
10
Summary
Corrie Ndaba is a ball-playing centre-back: 82% pass completion, 10 line-breaking passes and 4.0 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]
Based on 3 matches (178 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is build-up — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-playing centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.