العربيةSeason20262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026

Logan Costa

Villarreal
Ball-playing centre-back CB
8.5 progressive passes/90 · 2.0 line-breaking/90
centre-backball-playing centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
179
minutes
2 apps
132
passes
92% completed
92%
pass completion
132 passes
17
progressive passes
8.5/90
9
line-breaking passes
4.5/90
14
defensive actions
7.0/90
1
tackles + interceptions
0% tackle win
2
clearances
1.0/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Logan Costa has played 2 matches (179 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (64% of his 132 passes)
92% completion · 132× in 2/2 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
8.5 prog/90 · 9× in 2/2 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 8× in 2/2 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
8.5/90 · 17× in 2/2 matches
Signature: Receive → Break A Line → Switch Play → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
12

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
66
passes / match
7.0
def actions / 90
52–80
pass range (matches)
2
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (52 at the low end, 80 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

06

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

46 tracked carries (23.1/90, 13 progressive, 403m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

4%4%2%4%2%15%15%13%4%9%20%7%
progressivelateral/short% of his 46 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 23m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
3Outside → Inside
39Inside → Inside
3Outside → Outside
1Inside → Outside
First (21)Second (14)Third (11)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI too few tackle duels this season to read a pattern.

He attempted only 0 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

03

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

17
progressive · 8.5/90
17
final-third entries · 8.5/90
1
box entries · 0.50/90
35
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
09

How does he create chances?

0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
07

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.290.280.230.190.110.09
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.29
Left Half-Space Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.28
Right Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.23
Left Wing Mid third → Left Wing Att third
1 passes
0.19
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
3 passes
0.11
Right Half-Space Mid third → Central Mid third
1 passes
0.09
Central Mid third → Left Half-Space Mid third
1 passes
04

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Logan Costa gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
22%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
17%
Secondary
Central, Middle third
15%
Third
Right Half-Space, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
05

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Logan Costa actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
211191618122412243410431
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

2%3%8%3%2%1%6%9%18%9%2%2%8%14%12%1%
own goal left, attacking →
08

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

1Cutback
17Progressive
9Long ball
8Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
12Outside → Inside
66Inside → Inside
9Outside → Outside
35Inside → Outside
By direction
81Forward
13Backward
38Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches from the left hs to the right hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 passes worth 0.29 xT.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the central in the middle third: 14% of his 22 touches there are lost (3 times).
—4 touches · too few—5 touches · too few0%0/17 lost0%0/10 lost—4 touches · too few—4 touches · too few0%0/20 lost14%3/22 lost7%2/29 lost0%0/10 lost—0 touches · too few—4 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

10

Impact on the Team

Villarreal's output per match with Logan Costa (2 matches) versus without him (8 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 8 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (2)
WITHOUT (8)
Δ
goals against /match
1.50
1.38
+0.12
points /match
0.50
1.38
-0.88
goals for /match
1.00
1.62
-0.62
xG for /match
1.69
1.91
-0.22
11

His Share of the Team

Of everything Villarreal produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Logan Costa specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
final-third entries
1%
22 / 1945
threat added by passing (xT)
1%
4.5 / 488.0
shots
1%
4 / 644
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

13

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 585 centre-backs in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-playing centre-back75%Stopper centre-back20%
Why Ball-playing centre-back 75%: a weighted blend of progression 95 (weight 25%) + retention 72 (weight 30%) + build-up 67 (weight 30%) + press resistance 34 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
line-breaking, through-balls, passing directness, final-third threat, progression, box threat, receiving zones, creativity
Strong
transition, carrying, retention
Average
build-up, crossing
Weak
press resistance, territory (wide vs central), ball-winning, defensive aggression, dribbling
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Line-breaking
98
Through-balls ~proxy
98
Passing directness
98
Final-third threat
97
Progression
95
Box threat
94
Receiving zones
90
Creativity
88
Transition ~proxy
81
Carrying
79
Retention
72
Build-up
67
Crossing
53
Press resistance ~proxy
34
Territory (wide vs central)
23
Ball-winning
15
Defensive aggression
12
Dribbling
10
14

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 190 cm / 91 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Matthias Ginter Freiburg · Bundesliga · 191 cm / 89 kg
82%
Driven by: ball-winning (13%), box threat (12%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Costa more via through-balls, passing directness; Ginter more via defensive aggression, dribbling.
Chidozie Awaziem Nantes · Ligue 1 25/26 · 189 cm / 78 kg
79%
Driven by: defensive aggression (14%), creativity (11%), through-balls (11%). Different mechanism — Costa more via retention, box threat; Awaziem more via dribbling, crossing.
Renato Veiga Villarreal · 188 cm / 88 kg
77%
Driven by: defensive aggression (20%), ball-winning (9%), transition (9%). Different mechanism — Costa more via box threat, through-balls.
Jan Paul van Hecke Tottenham · Premier League · 189 cm / 79 kg
76%
Driven by: progression (14%), final-third threat (12%), receiving zones (9%). Different mechanism — Costa more via through-balls, box threat; Hecke more via defensive aggression, ball-winning.
Adrián de la Fuente Levante · 179 cm / 77 kg
76%
Driven by: box threat (13%), defensive aggression (12%), final-third threat (12%). Different mechanism — Costa more via retention, build-up; Fuente more via dribbling, territory (wide vs central).
Andreas Christensen Barcelona · 189 cm / 84 kg
76%
Driven by: transition (12%), receiving zones (12%), dribbling (11%). Different mechanism — Costa more via through-balls, line-breaking; Christensen more via defensive aggression, ball-winning.
15

Summary

Logan Costa is a ball-playing centre-back: 92% pass completion, 9 line-breaking passes and 8.5 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 2 matches (179 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is press resistance — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-playing centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report