العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2026

Oier Zarraga

Udinese
Ball-winning 6 (destroyer) DM
8.1 defensive actions/90
defensive midtempo controllerpress resistancescreening
177
minutes
5 apps
79
passes
95% completed
95%
pass completion
79 passes
5
progressive passes
2.5/90
16
defensive actions
8.1/90
1
tackles + interceptions
0% tackle win
4
recoveries
2.0/90
3
line-breaking passes
1.5/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Oier Zarraga has played 5 matches (177 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
drop between the centre-backs — mostly in the middle third (59% of his 79 passes)
95% completion · 79× in 5/5 matches
↓
PROGRESS CENTRAL
break a line through the middle
2.5 prog/90 · 3× in 2/5 matches
↓
SCREEN / WIN BALL
protect the back four
2.5 ball-wins/90 · 5× in 5/5 matches
↓
RECYCLE / PROGRESS
keep it ticking, feed the final third
5.6 f3-entries/90 · 11× in 2/5 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress Central → Screen / Win Ball → Recycle / Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: escape pressure — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

04

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

19 tracked carries (9.7/90, 5 progressive, 180m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

11%16%5%11%5%16%16%11%11%
progressivelateral/short% of his 19 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 26m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
1Outside → Inside
14Inside → Inside
4Outside → Outside
First (19)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI too few tackle duels this season to read a pattern.

He attempted only 1 dribble of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

03

How does he create chances?

2 key passes (1.02/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
100%
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 2 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he switches it out from the left hs to the left wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the middle third: 14% of his 14 touches there are lost (2 times).
—1 touch · too few—1 touch · too few—5 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—1 touch · too few—3 touches · too few14%2/14 lost7%1/14 lost0%0/12 lost—4 touches · too few—6 touches · too few—6 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—5 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

05

How & where does he defend?

16 defensive actions across the season (8.1/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
0
tackles · 0% won
1
interceptions · 0.5/90
4
recoveries · 2.0/90
1
clearances · 0.5/90
1
blocks
46
avg action height
3
won high (att 3rd)
10
middle third
3
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 5 proactive ball-wins (2.5/90), tackle success 0%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

06

Impact on the Team

Udinese's output per match with Oier Zarraga (5 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (5)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals against /match
2.00
2.67
-0.67
points /match
0.80
0.00
+0.80
goals for /match
1.20
1.00
+0.20
xG for /match
0.98
1.08
-0.10
07

His Share of the Team

Of everything Udinese produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Oier Zarraga specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
final-third entries
2%
31 / 1492
interceptions
2%
7 / 347
ball recoveries
2%
30 / 1584
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

08

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 258 defensive mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Tempo controller38%Deep-lying playmaker33%Ball-winning 627%
Why Tempo controller 38%: a weighted blend of retention 64 (weight 35%) + build-up 30 (weight 30%) + press resistance 36 (weight 20%) + progression 34 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
—
Average
territory (wide vs central), retention, crossing, passing directness, defensive aggression
Weak
final-third threat, transition, box threat, carrying, press resistance, progression, line-breaking, receiving zones, build-up, creativity, ball-winning, dribbling, through-balls
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
68
Retention
64
Crossing
61
Passing directness
51
Defensive aggression
46
Final-third threat
40
Transition ~proxy
39
Box threat
37
Carrying
36
Press resistance ~proxy
36
Progression
34
Line-breaking
34
Receiving zones
31
Build-up
30
Creativity
23
Ball-winning
17
Dribbling
15
Through-balls ~proxy
11
09

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 175 cm / 76 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Yannick Gerhardt Wolfsburg · Bundesliga 25/26 · 184 cm / 81 kg
78%
Driven by: ball-winning (27%), dribbling (19%), press resistance (9%). Different mechanism — Zarraga more via line-breaking, retention; Gerhardt more via box threat, through-balls.
Oriol Rey Levante · La Liga · 177 cm / 71 kg
77%
Driven by: ball-winning (25%), dribbling (19%), creativity (12%). Different mechanism — Zarraga more via retention, defensive aggression; Rey more via through-balls, line-breaking.
Ryan Yates Nottingham Forest · Premier League · 190 cm / 87 kg
73%
Driven by: creativity (16%), ball-winning (14%), through-balls (13%). Different mechanism — Zarraga more via carrying, retention; Yates more via box threat.
Mouhamed Diop Troyes · Ligue 1 · 182 cm
69%
Driven by: dribbling (18%), creativity (16%), ball-winning (14%). Different mechanism — Zarraga more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking; Diop more via box threat, defensive aggression.
Djibril Coulibaly Nice · Ligue 1 · 190 cm / 76 kg
67%
Driven by: creativity (16%), through-balls (15%), ball-winning (15%). Different mechanism — Zarraga more via passing directness, territory (wide vs central); Coulibaly more via build-up, defensive aggression.
Tomás Soucek West Ham · Premier League 25/26 · 192 cm / 86 kg
66%
Driven by: ball-winning (20%), dribbling (12%), through-balls (9%). Different mechanism — Zarraga more via retention, crossing; Soucek more via box threat.
10

Summary

Oier Zarraga is a tempo controller: 95% completion, 3 line-breaks and 2.5 progressive passes /90, resisting pressure with 0% dribble success. A central controller. [Off-ball screening position and scanning need tracking data.]

Based on 5 matches (177 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a tempo controller — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is build-up — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall tempo controller profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report