العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2026

Devyne Rensch

Roma
Central midfielder CM
balanced central profile
central middeep-lying playmakerprogressionbox-to-box
220
minutes
6 apps
2
progressive passes
0.8/90
80%
pass completion
112 passes
2
key passes
0.82/90
0
box entries
0.00/90
6
final-3rd entries
2.5/90
2
dribbles
50% won
23
possessions lost
2.39 danger/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Devyne Rensch has played 6 matches (220 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Left Wing, Attacking third — mostly in the attacking third (53% of his 112 passes)
80% completion · 112× in 6/6 matches
Signature: Only Receive shows a proven, repeatable pattern this season — too little evidence yet (6 matches loaded) for a fuller signature chain.
Not a pattern: progress — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); arrive — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); create / finish — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
13

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
19
passes / match
2.0
dribbles / match
3–52
pass range (matches)
2–2
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (3 at the low end, 52 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

07

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

16 tracked carries (6.5/90, 2 progressive, 141m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

12%6%12%6%12%31%6%12%
progressivelateral/short% of his 16 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 25m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
2Outside → Inside
2Inside → Inside
12Outside → Outside
First (16)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Only 2 dribbles attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.

02

How does he create chances?

2 key passes (0.82/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
50%50%
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
04

Where does he become vulnerable?

23 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

12
attacking third (cheap)
8
middle third
3
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 52% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.39 danger-index/90 · 0.254 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Devyne Rensch gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
28%
Primary
Left Wing, Attacking third
18%
Secondary
Left Wing, Middle third
14%
Third
Right Wing, Attacking third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
06

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Devyne Rensch actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
2781619151687178
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

5%7%6%15%7%1%2%6%7%14%16%12%
own goal left, attacking →
08

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

2Key pass
1Cross
2Cutback
2Progressive
1Long ball
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
25Outside → Inside
8Inside → Inside
52Outside → Outside
5Inside → Outside
By direction
34Forward
44Backward
34Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 2 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right hs toward the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the middle third: 24% of his 21 touches there are lost (5 times).
—6 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—6 touches · too few20%3/15 lost—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—2 touches · too few24%5/21 lost12%2/16 lost22%2/9 lost—0 touches · too few—3 touches · too few16%5/31 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

10

How & where does he defend?

30 defensive actions across the season (12.3/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
3
tackles · 33% won
4
interceptions · 1.6/90
7
recoveries · 2.9/90
5
clearances · 2.0/90
1
blocks
38
avg action height
5
won high (att 3rd)
10
middle third
15
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 14 proactive ball-wins (5.7/90), tackle success 33%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
09

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Devyne Rensch keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 4.6, 2m)
0.13
0.0
0.00
0%
Mid press (PPDA 6.0, 2m)
0.76
1.2
1.25
50%
Low press (PPDA 7.4, 2m)
0.66
0.0
0.00
0%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

11

Impact on the Team

Roma's output per match with Devyne Rensch (6 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (6)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals for /match
2.17
3.33
-1.17
xG for /match
1.66
1.05
+0.61
goals against /match
1.17
0.33
+0.83
points /match
2.00
3.00
-1.00
12

His Share of the Team

Of everything Roma produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Devyne Rensch specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
interceptions
4%
21 / 486
tackles
4%
34 / 806
progressive passes
4%
98 / 2426
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

14

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 382 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Deep-lying playmaker50%Tempo controller48%Advanced playmaker (8)42%Box-to-box runner34%
Why Deep-lying playmaker 50%: a weighted blend of progression 58 (weight 30%) + build-up 48 (weight 30%) + retention 49 (weight 20%) + press resistance 47 (weight 20%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
territory (wide vs central)
Strong
line-breaking
Average
crossing, through-balls, ball-winning, progression, final-third threat, retention, defensive aggression, build-up, receiving zones, press resistance, creativity
Weak
dribbling, box threat, passing directness, transition, carrying
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
91
Line-breaking
75
Crossing
70
Through-balls ~proxy
68
Ball-winning
67
Progression
58
Final-third threat
49
Retention
49
Defensive aggression
48
Build-up
48
Receiving zones
47
Press resistance ~proxy
47
Creativity
44
Dribbling
35
Box threat
20
Passing directness
13
Transition ~proxy
12
Carrying
11
15

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 181 cm / 75 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Daniel Svensson Borussia Dortmund · Bundesliga · 183 cm / 72 kg
84%
Driven by: transition (23%), passing directness (20%), territory (wide vs central) (18%). Different mechanism — Rensch more via line-breaking, ball-winning; Svensson more via carrying.
Alessandro Zanoli Udinese · 188 cm / 74 kg
70%
Driven by: transition (22%), territory (wide vs central) (18%), box threat (15%). Different mechanism — Rensch more via ball-winning; Zanoli more via dribbling, carrying.
Javi Rueda Celta Vigo · La Liga · 177 cm / 74 kg
66%
Driven by: transition (30%), territory (wide vs central) (18%), passing directness (17%). Different mechanism — Rensch more via crossing, ball-winning; Rueda more via dribbling.
Rafa Obrador Sassuolo · 181 cm / 72 kg
66%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (22%), transition (21%), passing directness (20%). Different mechanism — Rensch more via line-breaking, receiving zones; Obrador more via carrying.
Angeliño Deportivo · La Liga · 171 cm / 69 kg
66%
Driven by: carrying (19%), territory (wide vs central) (17%), transition (11%). Different mechanism — Rensch more via retention, press resistance; Angeliño more via through-balls, line-breaking.
Davide Bartesaghi AC Milan · 193 cm / 86 kg
65%
Driven by: transition (22%), territory (wide vs central) (15%), passing directness (12%). Different mechanism — Rensch more via ball-winning; Bartesaghi more via carrying, box threat.
16

Summary

Devyne Rensch is a deep-lying playmaker: 0.8 progressive passes, 0.82 key passes /90, 0 box entries, 0 goals from 0.00 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.

Based on 6 matches (220 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a deep-lying playmaker — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is press resistance — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall deep-lying playmaker profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report