العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLigue 1 2026

Pavel Sulc

Lyon
False 9 (dropping forward) ST
average position x=60 — drops deep · 1.67 key passes/90
strikerfalse 9box threatfinishing
431
minutes
7 apps
1
goals
1.14 xG
1.1
xG
6 shots
6
shots
0.19 xG/shot
2
box entries
0.42/90
8
key passes
1.67/90
8
dribbles
38% won
77%
pass completion
121 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Pavel Sulc has played 7 matches (431 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

LINK
lay-off and combine
8 key passes · 77% completion · 121× in 7/7 matches
↓
FINISH
shoot from central zones
1.14 xG · 6× in 5/7 matches
Signature: Link → Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: receive / move — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); convert — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
15

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
17
passes / match
1.3
dribbles / match
3–29
pass range (matches)
1–2
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (3 at the low end, 29 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

09

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

31 tracked carries (6.5/90, 8 progressive, 295m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

10%10%6%3%3%13%10%13%13%19%
progressivelateral/short% of his 31 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 29m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
4Outside → Inside
18Inside → Inside
6Outside → Outside
3Inside → Outside
First (19)Second (12)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Does he drop to link or stay central? Touches by channel. Season rate: 1.67 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 50%
OUTSIDE 50%
Dribble location — 4 inside · 4 outside
Right Wing
1 · 12%
Right Half-Space
2 · 25%
Central
2 · 25%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
3 · 38%
Vision AI His touches are spread wide — a roaming forward.
03

How does he create chances?

8 key passes (1.67/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
12%25%25%25%12%
chance creation (8)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (5)from the right (3)of 8 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
06

Where does he become vulnerable?

33 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

18
attacking third (cheap)
13
middle third
2
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 55% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.55 danger-index/90 · 0.225 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
07

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Pavel Sulc gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
16%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
14%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Attacking third
13%
Third
Central, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
08

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Pavel Sulc actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
1213191834911157126123
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

9%5%10%2%2%7%9%9%3%1%2%11%16%13%1%
own goal left, attacking →
10

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

8Key pass
2Cutback
10Progressive
6Long ball
3Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
2Outside → Inside
56Inside → Inside
16Outside → Outside
19Inside → Outside
By direction
39Forward
24Backward
58Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 8 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the left hs toward the central in the final third — 4 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the central in the final third: 50% of his 8 touches there are lost (4 times).
—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—1 touch · too few—2 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—5 touches · too few15%2/13 lost12%2/17 lost19%4/21 lost31%4/13 lost—3 touches · too few29%4/14 lost50%4/8 lost17%3/18 lost—3 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
05

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 31 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he carries through central areas (58%). He carries from outside into the middle 4 times and out toward the touchline 3 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
04

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
1 · 3%
Progressive / key pass
4 · 13%
Simple pass
20 · 65%
No clean link
6 · 19%
Of 31 carries, 3% flow straight into a shot of his own, 13% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 19% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

12

How & where does he defend?

51 defensive actions across the season (10.6/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
6
tackles · 83% won
1
interceptions · 0.2/90
12
recoveries · 2.5/90
6
clearances · 1.3/90
2
blocks
44
avg action height
11
won high (att 3rd)
26
middle third
14
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 19 proactive ball-wins (4.0/90), tackle success 83%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

23
attacking-half actions · 4.80/90
11

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Pavel Sulc keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-3 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 5.2, 2m)
0.31
3.8
0.94
33%
Mid press (PPDA 5.9, 2m)
0.52
2.3
2.31
0%
Low press (PPDA 7.3, 3m)
0.28
1.0
1.51
67%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

13

Impact on the Team

Lyon's output per match with Pavel Sulc (7 matches) versus without him (1 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 1 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (7)
WITHOUT (1)
Δ
goals for /match
1.86
0.00
+1.86
xG for /match
1.48
0.00
+1.48
goals against /match
0.71
2.00
-1.29
points /match
2.00
0.00
+2.00
14

His Share of the Team

Of everything Lyon produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Pavel Sulc specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
expected goals (xG)
17%
8.6 / 49.0
shots
12%
50 / 415
successful take-ons
9%
18 / 192
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

16

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 299 strikers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

False 968%Poacher66%Target man66%Pressing forward65%
Why False 9 68%: a weighted blend of creativity 61 (weight 30%) + build-up 72 (weight 25%) + box threat 56 (weight 25%) + progression 67 (weight 20%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
final-third threat, ball-winning, through-balls, build-up
Average
dribbling, passing directness, territory (wide vs central), progression, crossing, transition, carrying, creativity, retention, line-breaking, press resistance, box threat, receiving zones, defensive aggression
Weak
—
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Final-third threat
78
Ball-winning
77
Through-balls ~proxy
72
Build-up
72
Dribbling
68
Passing directness
67
Territory (wide vs central)
67
Progression
67
Crossing
64
Transition ~proxy
64
Carrying
63
Creativity
61
Retention
60
Line-breaking
60
Press resistance ~proxy
60
Box threat
56
Receiving zones
56
Defensive aggression
51
17

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 177 cm / 75 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Franco Vázquez Cremonese · Serie A 25/26 · 187 cm / 82 kg
88%
Driven by: ball-winning (18%), final-third threat (13%), build-up (12%). Different mechanism — Sulc more via box threat; Vázquez more via line-breaking, transition.
Mikel Oyarzabal Real Sociedad · La Liga · 181 cm / 79 kg
87%
Driven by: final-third threat (14%), build-up (13%). Different mechanism — Oyarzabal more via carrying, line-breaking.
John Yeboah Venezia · Serie A · 170 cm / 66 kg
87%
Driven by: final-third threat (12%), build-up (11%), ball-winning (10%). Different mechanism — Sulc more via defensive aggression; Yeboah more via receiving zones, creativity.
Cucho Hernández Real Betis · La Liga · 176 cm / 79 kg
86%
Driven by: final-third threat (11%), transition (10%), progression (9%). Different mechanism — Hernández more via line-breaking, receiving zones.
Iván Romero Levante · La Liga · 172 cm / 72 kg
85%
Driven by: ball-winning (20%), final-third threat (11%), through-balls (10%). Different mechanism — Sulc more via passing directness; Romero more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking.
Sergio Camello Rayo Vallecano · La Liga · 177 cm / 69 kg
85%
Driven by: build-up (19%), final-third threat (12%), ball-winning (11%). Different mechanism — Sulc more via territory (wide vs central); Camello more via retention, line-breaking.
18

Summary

Pavel Sulc is a false 9 / poacher: 1 goals from 1.14 xG (-0.14 vs expected), 6 shots, 2 box entries. Under-performing his chances. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]

Based on 7 matches (431 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a false 9 / poacher — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is box threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall false 9 profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report