العربيةSeason20252026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026
RS

Pablo Ramón

Racing Santander
Ball-playing centre-back CB
6.6 progressive passes/90 · 0.4 line-breaking/90
Capability Analysis
Aerial & Box Defending48%vs 52 centre-backs
"Can he win the individual defensive battle in his own box?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
Clearances /907.0496%
Ball-Winning90%vs 52 centre-backs
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /901.5591%
Ball recoveries /906.298%
Tackles /902.3989%
Duels won /902.2581%
Breaking Pressure
only 171 pressured-passing actions across 4 high-press matches -- not enough sample (needs 5+ matches and 12+ actions)
Progression51%vs 52 centre-backs
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /903.5247%
Line-breaking passes /900.4211%
Threat added by passing /901.27xT77%
Pass accuracy89.32%68%
Ball-Carrying81%vs 52 centre-backs
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /907.1885%
Carry distance /90152.7m77%
centre-backstopper centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
639
minutes
8 apps
412
passes
89% completed
89%
pass completion
412 passes
47
progressive passes
6.6/90
34
line-breaking passes
4.8/90
167
defensive actions
23.5/90
28
tackles + interceptions
59% tackle win
50
clearances
7.0/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the defensive third (50% of his 412 passes)
89% completion · 412× in 8/8 matches
↓
CARRY OUT
step into midfield to commit a presser
5 carries · 10× in 4/8 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
6.6 prog/90 · 34× in 8/8 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 4× in 3/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
2.8/90 · 20× in 7/8 matches
Signature: receive in the first line → break the midfield line vertically → switch or progress. Press him early and shut the vertical lane to force the safe sideways ball.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
52
passes / match
23.5
def actions / 90
24–74
pass range (matches)
50
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (24 at the low end, 74 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

08

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

110 tracked carries (15.5/90, 28 progressive, 1084m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

6%15%12%8%1%11%15%12%2%1%4%4%8%2%
progressivelateral/short% of his 110 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 41m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
8Outside → Inside
80Inside → Inside
9Outside → Outside
13Inside → Outside
First (36)Second (32)Third (25)Fourth (17)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

17
tackle duels
10
won
7
beaten · 41%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 35%
OUTSIDE 65%
Tackle-duel location — 6 inside · 11 outside
Right Wing
5 · 29%
Right Half-Space
3 · 18%
Central
3 · 18%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
6 · 35%
Vision AI beaten in 7 of 17 tackle duels (41% loss rate) — a real defensive leak worth flagging.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 5 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

14%
vertical passes
44×
1%
switches
4×
31%
carries
95×
54%
short circulation
166×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW4564%2931%144%2RHS13739%5332%4424%335%7C1018%814%1437%3732%3210%10LHS544%217%930%1650%27LW3110%319%671%22FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the middle third → the right half-space in the middle third — 3 progressive passes (12% of his progression) at 0.035 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 36% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 8% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 2% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 3 line-breaking passes and 20 final-third entries, 7.8 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
7%16%15%7%1%4%16%10%4%0%2%5%8%3%1%
completedincomplete412 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
412
passes
89%
completed
44
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

47
progressive · 6.6/90
20
final-third entries · 2.8/90
2
box entries · 0.28/90
22
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

2 key passes (0.28/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
50%50%
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
09

Where does he become vulnerable?

45 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

1
attacking third (cheap)
21
middle third
23
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 2% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.38 danger-index/90 · 0.534 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05

What is his passing profile?

412
passes attempted
61%
mostly forward
57%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
253 · 61%
Sideways
130 · 32%
Backward
29 · 7%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
208 · 57%
Medium
143 · 39%
Long (>30m)
17 · 5%
10

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.380.260.240.210.190.18
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.38
Right Half-Space Def third → Right Wing Mid third
5 passes
0.26
Right Wing Mid third → Right Wing Mid third
3 passes
0.24
Left Wing Mid third → Left Wing Att third
1 passes
0.21
Right Half-Space Att third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.19
Central Mid third → Central Att third
1 passes
0.18
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Mid third
4 passes
06

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Pablo Ramón gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
20%
Primary
Right Half-Space, Defensive third
16%
Secondary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
15%
Third
Central, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
07

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Pablo Ramón actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
1021331451666431931286761294
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

7%16%15%7%1%4%16%10%4%0%2%5%8%3%1%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

2Key pass
1Cross
47Progressive
34Long ball
4Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
25Outside → Inside
194Inside → Inside
51Outside → Outside
98Inside → Outside
By direction
253Forward
29Backward
130Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the right hs to the right wing, advancing it forward in the defensive third — 5 passes worth 0.38 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 2 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right wing toward the central in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the middle third: 19% of his 21 touches there are lost (4 times).
17%4/23 lost13%11/84 lost5%3/61 lost15%4/27 lost8%1/12 lost17%5/30 lost10%7/68 lost7%3/45 lost3%1/31 lost19%4/21 lost—1 touch · too few—3 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—1 touch · too few—4 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

167 defensive actions across the season (23.5/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
17
tackles · 59% won
11
interceptions · 1.5/90
44
recoveries · 6.2/90
50
clearances · 7.0/90
0
blocks
29
avg action height
3
won high (att 3rd)
58
middle third
106
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 72 proactive ball-wins (10.1/90), tackle success 59%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Pablo Ramón still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 3.8, 2m)
84%
5.1
4.6
0.96
Mid press (PPDA 4.3, 2m)
91%
8.1
6.0
1.47
Low press (PPDA 5.3, 4m)
91%
6.8
4.4
1.36
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Racing Santander's output per match with Pablo Ramón (8 matches) versus without him (2 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 2 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (8)
WITHOUT (2)
Δ
goals against /match
2.12
4.50
-2.38
points /match
1.00
1.50
-0.50
goals for /match
1.25
2.50
-1.25
xG for /match
1.26
1.46
-0.20
16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Racing Santander produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Pablo Ramón specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
9%
50 / 554
interceptions
7%
11 / 163
ball recoveries
5%
44 / 859
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 515 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Stopper centre-back90%Ball-playing centre-back79%
Why Stopper centre-back 90%: a weighted blend of ball-winning 96 (weight 40%) + defensive aggression 76 (weight 35%) + retention 75 (weight 15%) + transition 95 (weight 10%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
passing directness, ball-winning, transition, dribbling, carrying
Strong
press resistance, build-up, defensive aggression, retention
Average
creativity, receiving zones, progression, final-third threat, territory (wide vs central)
Weak
box threat, crossing, line-breaking, through-balls
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
100
Ball-winning
96
Transition ~proxy
95
Dribbling
89
Carrying
87
Press resistance ~proxy
82
Build-up
77
Defensive aggression
76
Retention
75
Creativity
68
Receiving zones
65
Progression
60
Final-third threat
58
Territory (wide vs central)
45
Box threat
37
Crossing
29
Line-breaking
25
Through-balls ~proxy
15
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 184 cm / 80 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Mohammed Salisu Monaco · Ligue 1 · 191 cm / 82 kg
87%
Driven by: transition (22%), ball-winning (15%), passing directness (12%). Different mechanism — Ramón more via creativity, territory (wide vs central); Salisu more via box threat.
Jérémy Jacquet Liverpool · Premier League · 188 cm / 77 kg
80%
Driven by: transition (20%), ball-winning (13%), passing directness (13%). Different mechanism — Ramón more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression; Jacquet more via crossing.
Nayef Aguerd Marseille · Ligue 1 · 190 cm / 83 kg
78%
Driven by: transition (24%), passing directness (12%), carrying (11%). Different mechanism — Ramón more via dribbling, ball-winning; Aguerd more via line-breaking.
Leonardo Balerdi Roma · Serie A · 187 cm / 85 kg
73%
Driven by: ball-winning (18%), transition (18%), press resistance (11%). Different mechanism — Ramón more via territory (wide vs central), passing directness; Balerdi more via box threat, through-balls.
Kim Min-Jae Bayern · Bundesliga · 190 cm / 81 kg
73%
Driven by: transition (27%), passing directness (13%), press resistance (10%). Different mechanism — Ramón more via dribbling, ball-winning; Min-Jae more via through-balls, line-breaking.
Waldemar Anton Borussia Dortmund · Bundesliga · 189 cm / 86 kg
72%
Driven by: transition (22%), ball-winning (12%), carrying (11%). Different mechanism — Ramón more via territory (wide vs central), ball-winning; Anton more via through-balls, crossing.
20

Summary

Pablo Ramón is a stopper centre-back / ball-playing centre-back: 89% pass completion, 34 line-breaking passes and 6.6 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 8 matches (639 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a stopper centre-back / ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is retention — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall stopper centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report