His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Left Half-Space, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (71% of his 56 passes)
77% completion · 56× in 3/3 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
2.7 prog/90 · 3× in 2/3 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: arrive — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); create / finish — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
1 key passes (0.91/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
03
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right wing toward the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the central in the middle third: 25% of his 8 touches there are lost (2 times).
16 defensive actions across the season (14.5/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
3
tackles · 67% won
2
interceptions · 1.8/90
5
recoveries · 4.5/90
0
clearances · 0.0/90
3
blocks
55
avg action height
6
won high (att 3rd)
8
middle third
2
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 10 proactive ball-wins (9.1/90), tackle success 67%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Athletic Club's output per match with Beñat Prados (1 matches) versus without him (8 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 8 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (1)
WITHOUT (8)
Δ
goals for /match
4.00
1.00
+3.00
xG for /match
0.72
1.63
-0.90
goals against /match
0.00
1.12
-1.12
points /match
3.00
1.12
+1.88
06
His Share of the Team
Of everything Athletic Club produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Beñat Prados specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
interceptions
0%
2 / 458
tackles
0%
3 / 779
zone-14 entries
0%
1 / 339
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Beñat Prados is a central mid: 2.7 progressive passes, 0.91 key passes /90, 0 box entries, 0 goals from 0.03 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.
Based on 3 matches (99 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a central mid — best used in a system built around that identity.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
