العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLigue 1 2026

Anthony Rouault

Rennes
Ball-playing centre-back CB
5.3 progressive passes/90 · 0.4 line-breaking/90
Capability Analysis
Aerial & Box Defending41%vs 43 centre-backs
"Can he win the individual defensive battle in his own box?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
Clearances /905.8282%
Ball-Winning38%vs 43 centre-backs
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /900.8620%
Ball recoveries /902.8914%
Tackles /901.3348%
Duels won /902.0770%
Breaking Pressure
no action recorded in any high-press match yet
Progression74%vs 43 centre-backs
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /904.9284%
Line-breaking passes /901.2186%
Threat added by passing /901.3xT80%
Pass accuracy87.63%45%
Ball-Carrying54%vs 43 centre-backs
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /905.8255%
Carry distance /90129.93m52%
centre-backball-playing centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
476
minutes
5 apps
295
passes
87% completed
87%
pass completion
295 passes
28
progressive passes
5.3/90
19
line-breaking passes
3.6/90
87
defensive actions
16.4/90
12
tackles + interceptions
56% tackle win
37
clearances
7.0/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (55% of his 295 passes)
87% completion · 295× in 5/5 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
5.3 prog/90 · 19× in 5/5 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 5× in 3/5 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
4.5/90 · 24× in 5/5 matches
Signature: Receive → Break A Line → Switch Play → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
16

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
59
passes / match
16.4
def actions / 90
51–69
pass range (matches)
37
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (51 at the low end, 69 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

07

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

66 tracked carries (12.5/90, 12 progressive, 481m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

3%8%24%9%12%21%20%3%
progressivelateral/short% of his 66 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 6m, longest 21m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
5Outside → Inside
53Inside → Inside
5Outside → Outside
3Inside → Outside
First (38)Second (10)Third (10)Fourth (8)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

9
tackle duels
5
won
4
beaten · 44%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 78%
OUTSIDE 22%
Tackle-duel location — 7 inside · 2 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
3 · 33%
Left Half-Space
4 · 44%
Left Wing
2 · 22%
Vision AI beaten in 4 of 9 tackle duels (44% loss rate) — a real defensive leak worth flagging.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 1 dribble of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

13%
vertical passes
26×
3%
switches
5×
29%
carries
58×
55%
short circulation
108×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW1100%1RHS850%425%212%112%1C826%528%2332%2621%1713%11LHS1279%1234%4321%2735%45LW3818%729%1153%20FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the left half-space in the middle third → the left half-space in the middle third — 5 progressive passes (23% of his progression) at 0.052 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.

His progression is inward: 23% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 9% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 7% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 2 line-breaking passes and 24 final-third entries, 4.8 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
2%1%4%11%15%12%1%11%18%17%8%1%
completedincomplete295 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
295
passes
87%
completed
39
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 87% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

28
progressive · 5.3/90
24
final-third entries · 4.5/90
0
box entries · 0.00/90
17
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

1 key passes (0.19/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
100%
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
09

Where does he become vulnerable?

39 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

1
attacking third (cheap)
21
middle third
17
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 3% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 4.09 danger-index/90 · 0.554 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
08

What is his passing profile?

295
passes attempted
60%
mostly forward
53%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
176 · 60%
Sideways
89 · 30%
Backward
30 · 10%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
108 · 42%
Medium
136 · 53%
Long (>30m)
12 · 5%
10

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.410.310.210.180.170.14
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.41
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Mid third
5 passes
0.31
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
2 passes
0.21
Left Wing Mid third → Left Wing Mid third
4 passes
0.18
Central Mid third → Left Half-Space Mid third
2 passes
0.17
Left Wing Def third → Left Half-Space Mid third
2 passes
0.14
Left Half-Space Def third → Left Half-Space Mid third
1 passes
05

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Anthony Rouault gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
25%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Defensive third
22%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
21%
Third
Central, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
06

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Anthony Rouault actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
325252242123344342463
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

2%1%4%11%15%12%1%11%18%17%8%1%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

1Key pass
28Progressive
19Long ball
5Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
18Outside → Inside
152Inside → Inside
21Outside → Outside
65Inside → Outside
By direction
176Forward
30Backward
89Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the left hs in the middle third — 5 passes worth 0.41 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he switches from the left hs to the right hs in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 31% of his 26 touches there are lost (8 times).
—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few14%4/29 lost7%5/73 lost31%8/26 lost—1 touch · too few27%3/11 lost11%7/62 lost12%8/66 lost13%3/23 lost—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

87 defensive actions across the season (16.4/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
9
tackles · 56% won
3
interceptions · 0.6/90
14
recoveries · 2.6/90
37
clearances · 7.0/90
2
blocks
26
avg action height
3
won high (att 3rd)
26
middle third
58
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by clearing and blocking — a reactive, protect-the-box profile. 26 proactive ball-wins (4.9/90), tackle success 56%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

14

Impact on the Team

Rennes's output per match with Anthony Rouault (5 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (5)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals against /match
1.20
2.67
-1.47
points /match
2.40
1.33
+1.07
goals for /match
2.60
1.67
+0.93
xG for /match
1.95
1.57
+0.38
15

His Share of the Team

Of everything Rennes produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Anthony Rouault specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
15%
149 / 1017
final-third entries
8%
126 / 1667
threat added by passing (xT)
7%
33.4 / 466.4
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

17

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 517 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-playing centre-back62%Stopper centre-back37%
Why Ball-playing centre-back 62%: a weighted blend of progression 81 (weight 25%) + build-up 54 (weight 30%) + retention 49 (weight 30%) + press resistance 56 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
passing directness, receiving zones, line-breaking
Strong
progression
Average
final-third threat, box threat, creativity, transition, carrying, press resistance, dribbling, build-up, retention, defensive aggression, territory (wide vs central)
Weak
ball-winning, crossing, through-balls
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
89
Receiving zones
87
Line-breaking
86
Progression
81
Final-third threat
65
Box threat
63
Creativity
63
Transition ~proxy
57
Carrying
56
Press resistance ~proxy
56
Dribbling
54
Build-up
54
Retention
49
Defensive aggression
44
Territory (wide vs central)
40
Ball-winning
33
Crossing
30
Through-balls ~proxy
29
18

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 186 cm / 77 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Edmond Tapsoba Leverkusen · Bundesliga · 192 cm / 84 kg
73%
Driven by: receiving zones (19%), progression (17%), line-breaking (12%). Different mechanism — Tapsoba more via carrying, transition.
Eric Dier Monaco · 188 cm / 83 kg
73%
Driven by: passing directness (20%), receiving zones (15%), progression (12%). Different mechanism — Rouault more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking; Dier more via retention, press resistance.
Virgil van Dijk Liverpool · Premier League · 195 cm / 92 kg
70%
Driven by: passing directness (20%), receiving zones (15%), ball-winning (15%). Different mechanism — Rouault more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking; Dijk more via retention.
Dean Huijsen Real Madrid · La Liga · 195 cm / 87 kg
69%
Driven by: progression (20%), receiving zones (16%), passing directness (14%). Different mechanism — Huijsen more via retention, crossing.
Alessandro Circati Parma Calcio 1913 · Serie A 25/26 · 190 cm / 85 kg
66%
Driven by: receiving zones (20%), crossing (14%), creativity (12%). Different mechanism — Rouault more via box threat, passing directness.
Jacobo Ramón Como · Serie A · 195 cm / 80 kg
65%
Driven by: progression (19%), receiving zones (18%), passing directness (14%). Different mechanism — Ramón more via defensive aggression, carrying.
19

Summary

Anthony Rouault is a ball-playing centre-back: 87% pass completion, 19 line-breaking passes and 5.3 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 5 matches (476 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is retention — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-playing centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report