العربيةSeason20262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026

Ville Koski

Alaves
Stopper centre-back CB
13.6 defensive actions/90 · 3.3 progressive/90 — defends first
Capability Analysis
Aerial & Box Defending37%vs 52 centre-backs
"Can he win the individual defensive battle in his own box?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
Clearances /905.7274%
Ball-Winning24%vs 52 centre-backs
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /901.0751%
Ball recoveries /901.832%
Tackles /901.0713%
Duels won /901.2230%
Breaking Pressure53%vs 39 centre-backs
"Can he retain and progress the ball while his own team is being pressed?"
Retention under pressure85.0%49%
Progressive passes while pressed1187%
Line-breaking passes while pressed00%
Progressive carries while pressed892%
Threat added while pressed (xT)1.93xT36%
Progression14%vs 52 centre-backs
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /901.918%
Line-breaking passes /900.234%
Threat added by passing /900.56xT2%
Pass accuracy86.49%42%
Ball-Carrying15%vs 52 centre-backs
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /903.2817%
Carry distance /9074.01m13%
centre-backball-playing centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
873
minutes
10 apps
357
passes
87% completed
87%
pass completion
357 passes
32
progressive passes
3.3/90
35
line-breaking passes
3.6/90
132
defensive actions
13.6/90
18
tackles + interceptions
62% tackle win
57
clearances
5.9/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (52% of his 357 passes)
87% completion · 357× in 10/10 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
3.3 prog/90 · 35× in 9/10 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 12× in 5/10 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
1.4/90 · 14× in 5/10 matches
Signature: Receive → Break A Line → Switch Play → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
36
passes / match
13.6
def actions / 90
7–75
pass range (matches)
57
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (7 at the low end, 75 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

08

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

94 tracked carries (9.7/90, 22 progressive, 879m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

3%6%6%2%1%3%24%16%3%2%15%11%5%1%
progressivelateral/short% of his 94 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 22m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
9Outside → Inside
73Inside → Inside
9Outside → Outside
3Inside → Outside
First (39)Second (23)Third (16)Fourth (16)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

8
tackle duels
5
won
3
beaten · 38%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 100%
OUTSIDE 0%
Tackle-duel location — 8 inside · 0 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
5 · 62%
Left Half-Space
3 · 38%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 3 of 8 tackle duels (38% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 1 dribble of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

10%
vertical passes
28×
4%
switches
11×
31%
carries
82×
55%
short circulation
146×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW1828%528%539%76%1RHS7137%2620%1430%2114%10C11713%1520%2330%3526%3012%14LHS822%27%623%1920%1648%39LW2412%329%758%14FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right half-space in the defensive third → the right half-space in the middle third — 2 progressive passes (10% of his progression) at 0.064 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.

His progression is inward: 40% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 0% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

12% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 3 line-breaking passes and 14 final-third entries, 4.7 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
3%9%10%4%0%4%19%19%6%0%2%10%10%4%1%1%
completedincomplete357 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
357
passes
87%
completed
45
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 87% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

32
progressive · 3.3/90
14
final-third entries · 1.4/90
0
box entries · 0.00/90
12
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
09

Where does he become vulnerable?

45 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

4
attacking third (cheap)
24
middle third
17
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 9% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.23 danger-index/90 · 0.480 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05

What is his passing profile?

357
passes attempted
55%
mostly forward
58%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
198 · 55%
Sideways
119 · 33%
Backward
40 · 11%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
113 · 36%
Medium
182 · 58%
Long (>30m)
17 · 5%
10

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.280.260.250.210.200.18
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.28
Central Def third → Central Mid third
3 passes
0.26
Right Half-Space Mid third → Central Mid third
2 passes
0.25
Right Half-Space Def third → Right Half-Space Mid third
3 passes
0.21
Central Def third → Central Att third
1 passes
0.20
Left Wing Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.18
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
2 passes
06

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Ville Koski gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
18%
Primary
Central, Middle third
17%
Secondary
Central, Defensive third
14%
Third
Left Half-Space, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
07

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Ville Koski actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
734341452166769201393134141
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

3%9%10%4%0%4%19%19%6%0%2%10%10%4%1%1%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

2Cross
32Progressive
35Long ball
12Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
23Outside → Inside
174Inside → Inside
19Outside → Outside
96Inside → Outside
By direction
198Forward
40Backward
119Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the central, advancing it forward in the defensive third — 3 passes worth 0.28 xT.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the middle third: 36% of his 14 touches there are lost (5 times).
33%4/12 lost12%5/42 lost2%1/62 lost9%3/35 lost33%4/12 lost36%5/14 lost13%5/39 lost15%10/66 lost4%2/51 lost13%2/15 lost—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—5 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

132 defensive actions across the season (13.6/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
8
tackles · 62% won
10
interceptions · 1.0/90
19
recoveries · 2.0/90
57
clearances · 5.9/90
2
blocks
28
avg action height
6
won high (att 3rd)
41
middle third
85
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by clearing and blocking — a reactive, protect-the-box profile. 37 proactive ball-wins (3.8/90), tackle success 62%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Ville Koski still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~3-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 3.1, 3m)
84%
2.7
2.3
0.39
Mid press (PPDA 4.2, 3m)
87%
1.6
1.6
0.52
Low press (PPDA 5.4, 4m)
88%
4.7
5.6
0.92
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Ville Koski played nearly every Alaves match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Alaves produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Ville Koski specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
8%
75 / 982
goals
7%
1 / 14
interceptions
4%
14 / 360
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 513 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-playing centre-back44%Stopper centre-back21%
Why Ball-playing centre-back 44%: a weighted blend of retention 59 (weight 30%) + build-up 49 (weight 30%) + press resistance 63 (weight 15%) + progression 15 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
passing directness
Average
press resistance, retention, dribbling, build-up, box threat
Weak
transition, ball-winning, carrying, defensive aggression, territory (wide vs central), through-balls, crossing, progression, creativity, receiving zones, final-third threat, line-breaking
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
84
Press resistance ~proxy
63
Retention
59
Dribbling
52
Build-up
49
Box threat
44
Transition ~proxy
35
Ball-winning
25
Carrying
22
Defensive aggression
21
Territory (wide vs central)
17
Through-balls ~proxy
15
Crossing
15
Progression
15
Creativity
13
Receiving zones
10
Final-third threat
10
Line-breaking
8
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 185 cm) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Christian Kabasele Udinese · Serie A · 187 cm / 84 kg
96%
Driven by: final-third threat (11%), progression (11%), receiving zones (10%).
Maximilian Kilman West Ham · Premier League 25/26 · 194 cm / 89 kg
89%
Driven by: receiving zones (12%), defensive aggression (11%), ball-winning (10%). Different mechanism — Koski more via box threat; Kilman more via through-balls, dribbling.
Jay Idzes Sassuolo · Serie A · 184 cm / 82 kg
89%
Driven by: defensive aggression (12%), final-third threat (10%), creativity (10%). Different mechanism — Koski more via box threat, passing directness; Idzes more via dribbling.
Jorge Herrando Osasuna · 192 cm / 78 kg
86%
Driven by: progression (13%), final-third threat (13%), crossing (11%). Different mechanism — Koski more via box threat; Herrando more via territory (wide vs central), creativity.
Maxime Estève RBL · Bundesliga · 193 cm / 87 kg
84%
Driven by: progression (14%), line-breaking (12%), final-third threat (10%). Different mechanism — Koski more via passing directness, dribbling; Estève more via creativity.
Ousmane Camara Angers · Ligue 1 · 197 cm / 90 kg
84%
Driven by: final-third threat (14%), progression (13%), crossing (11%). Different mechanism — Camara more via creativity, ball-winning.
20

Summary

Ville Koski is a ball-playing centre-back: 87% pass completion, 35 line-breaking passes and 3.3 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 10 matches (873 minutes) — a reasonable read, still building toward a full-season sample. He profiles as a ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-playing centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report