العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLigue 1 2026

CJ Egan-Riley

Marseille
Ball-playing centre-back CB
6.0 progressive passes/90 · 0.6 line-breaking/90
Capability Analysis
Aerial & Box Defending33%vs 43 centre-backs
"Can he win the individual defensive battle in his own box?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
Clearances /905.1266%
Ball-Winning33%vs 43 centre-backs
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /900.617%
Ball recoveries /903.6545%
Tackles /901.1632%
Duels won /901.5248%
Breaking Pressure
no action recorded in any high-press match yet
Progression51%vs 43 centre-backs
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /902.4427%
Line-breaking passes /900.4327%
Threat added by passing /901.11xT57%
Pass accuracy93.36%93%
Ball-Carrying83%vs 43 centre-backs
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /907.8680%
Carry distance /90186.22m86%
centre-backball-playing centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
749
minutes
8 apps
539
passes
94% completed
94%
pass completion
539 passes
50
progressive passes
6.0/90
38
line-breaking passes
4.6/90
133
defensive actions
16.0/90
18
tackles + interceptions
44% tackle win
50
clearances
6.0/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (57% of his 539 passes)
94% completion · 539× in 8/8 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
6.0 prog/90 · 38× in 8/8 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 12× in 6/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
2.5/90 · 21× in 8/8 matches
Signature: Receive → Break A Line → Switch Play → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
67
passes / match
16.0
def actions / 90
37–121
pass range (matches)
50
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (37 at the low end, 121 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

08

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

163 tracked carries (19.6/90, 26 progressive, 1320m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

9%21%17%4%1%1%15%20%9%1%1%
progressivelateral/short% of his 163 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 6m, longest 30m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
13Outside → Inside
139Inside → Inside
5Outside → Outside
6Inside → Outside
First (68)Second (38)Third (36)Fourth (21)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

9
tackle duels
4
won
5
beaten · 56%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 78%
OUTSIDE 22%
Tackle-duel location — 7 inside · 2 outside
Right Wing
2 · 22%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
4 · 44%
Left Half-Space
3 · 33%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 5 of 9 tackle duels (56% loss rate) — a real defensive leak worth flagging.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 1 dribble of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

11%
vertical passes
45×
2%
switches
9×
34%
carries
137×
52%
short circulation
210×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW4549%2236%1616%7RHS27434%9217%4736%10012%321%3C17413%2320%3526%4535%616%10LHS128%125%325%342%5LW250%150%1FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: central areas in the middle third → central areas in the middle third — 4 progressive passes (20% of his progression) at 0.040 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.

His progression is inward: 35% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 15% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 7% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 5 line-breaking passes and 21 final-third entries, 4.6 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
6%19%17%6%1%0%2%14%21%11%1%0%0%1%1%0%0%
completedincomplete539 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
539
passes
94%
completed
32
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 94% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

50
progressive · 6.0/90
21
final-third entries · 2.5/90
1
box entries · 0.12/90
18
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
10

Where does he become vulnerable?

32 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

2
attacking third (cheap)
15
middle third
15
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 6% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.99 danger-index/90 · 0.516 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05

What is his passing profile?

539
passes attempted
44%
mostly forward
59%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
239 · 44%
Sideways
200 · 37%
Backward
100 · 19%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
183 · 36%
Medium
300 · 59%
Long (>30m)
24 · 5%
09

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.500.360.320.260.230.20
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.50
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Mid third
10 passes
0.36
Right Half-Space Def third → Right Wing Mid third
6 passes
0.32
Central Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.26
Central Def third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.23
Right Wing Def third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.20
Central Mid third → Central Mid third
2 passes
06

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where CJ Egan-Riley gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
29%
Primary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
23%
Secondary
Right Half-Space, Defensive third
22%
Third
Central, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
07

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where CJ Egan-Riley actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
116311976112605130102903472
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

6%19%17%6%1%0%2%14%21%11%1%0%0%1%1%0%0%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

2Cutback
50Progressive
38Long ball
12Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
24Outside → Inside
326Inside → Inside
23Outside → Outside
134Inside → Outside
By direction
239Forward
100Backward
200Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the right hs to the right wing in the middle third — 10 passes worth 0.50 xT.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the middle third: 33% of his 12 touches there are lost (4 times).
18%5/28 lost4%5/126 lost8%5/59 lost—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few14%3/21 lost5%7/155 lost1%1/118 lost33%4/12 lost—2 touches · too few—4 touches · too few—7 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

133 defensive actions across the season (16.0/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
9
tackles · 44% won
9
interceptions · 1.1/90
31
recoveries · 3.7/90
50
clearances · 6.0/90
2
blocks
28
avg action height
8
won high (att 3rd)
37
middle third
88
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by clearing and blocking — a reactive, protect-the-box profile. 49 proactive ball-wins (5.9/90), tackle success 44%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can CJ Egan-Riley still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 5.0, 2m)
90%
4.5
3.6
0.60
Mid press (PPDA 5.9, 2m)
92%
7.6
5.2
1.18
Low press (PPDA 9.0, 4m)
96%
6.0
4.7
1.23
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: CJ Egan-Riley played nearly every Marseille match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Marseille produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through CJ Egan-Riley specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
12%
84 / 677
goals
6%
1 / 18
threat added by passing (xT)
5%
18.2 / 356.4
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 517 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-playing centre-back75%Stopper centre-back46%
Why Ball-playing centre-back 75%: a weighted blend of retention 82 (weight 30%) + build-up 77 (weight 30%) + progression 51 (weight 25%) + press resistance 57 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
retention, build-up, carrying
Average
through-balls, transition, press resistance, final-third threat, progression, passing directness, defensive aggression
Weak
creativity, receiving zones, dribbling, ball-winning, crossing, line-breaking, box threat, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Retention
82
Build-up
77
Carrying
76
Through-balls ~proxy
68
Transition ~proxy
66
Press resistance ~proxy
57
Final-third threat
56
Progression
51
Passing directness
51
Defensive aggression
48
Creativity
40
Receiving zones
39
Dribbling
35
Ball-winning
33
Crossing
32
Line-breaking
30
Box threat
14
Territory (wide vs central)
8
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 183 cm / 70 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Timothée Kolodziejczak Paris FC 25/26 · 185 cm / 75 kg
79%
Driven by: box threat (17%), build-up (14%), territory (wide vs central) (12%). Different mechanism — Egan-Riley more via receiving zones, creativity; Kolodziejczak more via passing directness, dribbling.
Yoel Lago Celta Vigo · La Liga · 185 cm / 70 kg
73%
Driven by: box threat (20%), territory (wide vs central) (18%), retention (18%). Different mechanism — Egan-Riley more via through-balls, final-third threat; Lago more via passing directness, ball-winning.
Ezri Konsa Arsenal · Premier League · 183 cm / 76 kg
72%
Driven by: retention (17%), build-up (16%), territory (wide vs central) (15%). Different mechanism — Egan-Riley more via through-balls, defensive aggression; Konsa more via receiving zones, dribbling.
Levi Colwill Chelsea · Premier League · 187 cm / 83 kg
72%
Driven by: box threat (27%), retention (17%), build-up (14%). Different mechanism — Egan-Riley more via carrying; Colwill more via crossing, dribbling.
Andrew Omobamidele Strasbourg · 188 cm / 78 kg
68%
Driven by: build-up (20%), territory (wide vs central) (13%), retention (9%). Different mechanism — Egan-Riley more via through-balls, final-third threat; Omobamidele more via passing directness, build-up.
Youssouf Ndayishimiye Nice · 183 cm / 79 kg
68%
Driven by: box threat (25%), territory (wide vs central) (20%), build-up (16%). Different mechanism — Egan-Riley more via through-balls, carrying; Ndayishimiye more via passing directness, ball-winning.
20

Summary

CJ Egan-Riley is a ball-playing centre-back: 94% pass completion, 38 line-breaking passes and 6.0 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 8 matches (749 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-playing centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report