العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLigue 1 2026

Ibrahima Baldé

Lorient
Pressing forward ST
4.2 high defensive actions/90
strikerpressing forwardbox threatfinishing
320
minutes
6 apps
1
goals
0.84 xG
0.8
xG
7 shots
7
shots
0.12 xG/shot
1
box entries
0.28/90
1
key passes
0.28/90
2
dribbles
50% won
79%
pass completion
47 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

LINK
lay-off and combine
1 key passes · 79% completion · 47× in 6/6 matches
↓
FINISH
shoot from central zones
0.84 xG · 7× in 5/6 matches
↓
CONVERT
goals vs expected
1 goals (+0.2 vs xG) · 1× in 5/6 matches
Signature: Link → Finish → Convert — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: receive / move — 1× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

04

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

14 tracked carries (3.9/90, 7 progressive, 187m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

7%7%7%7%29%7%14%14%7%
progressivelateral/short% of his 14 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 11m, longest 32m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
2Outside → Inside
8Inside → Inside
2Outside → Outside
2Inside → Outside
First (14)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Only 2 dribbles attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.

02

How does he create chances?

1 key passes (0.28/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
100%
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (1)from the right (0)of 1 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the central in the middle third: 14% of his 14 touches there are lost (2 times).
—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—4 touches · too few14%2/14 lost12%1/8 lost—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—4 touches · too few—5 touches · too few—4 touches · too few—4 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

06

How & where does he defend?

42 defensive actions across the season (11.8/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
1
tackles · 100% won
1
interceptions · 0.3/90
2
recoveries · 0.6/90
4
clearances · 1.1/90
3
blocks
59
avg action height
15
won high (att 3rd)
21
middle third
6
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by clearing and blocking — a reactive, protect-the-box profile. 4 proactive ball-wins (1.1/90), tackle success 100%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

33
attacking-half actions · 9.28/90
05

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Ibrahima Baldé keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 4.0, 2m)
0.14
0.0
0.00
0%
Mid press (PPDA 4.7, 2m)
0.37
0.0
0.93
0%
Low press (PPDA 7.3, 2m)
0.03
0.0
0.00
50%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

07

Impact on the Team

Lorient's output per match with Ibrahima Baldé (6 matches) versus without him (2 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 2 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (6)
WITHOUT (2)
Δ
goals for /match
1.00
0.50
+0.50
xG for /match
0.90
0.00
+0.90
goals against /match
0.67
1.00
-0.33
points /match
1.83
0.50
+1.33
08

His Share of the Team

Of everything Lorient produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Ibrahima Baldé specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
goals
17%
1 / 6
expected goals (xG)
4%
0.8 / 23.6
shots
3%
7 / 241
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

09

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 354 strikers in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Pressing forward48%Target man43%Transition runner39%Poacher37%
Why Pressing forward 48%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 71 (weight 45%) + ball-winning 27 (weight 30%) + transition 29 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
retention, crossing, through-balls, defensive aggression
Average
press resistance, build-up, carrying, final-third threat, dribbling
Weak
progression, line-breaking, box threat, transition, ball-winning, receiving zones, passing directness, creativity, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Retention
85
Crossing
84
Through-balls ~proxy
81
Defensive aggression
71
Press resistance ~proxy
68
Build-up
67
Carrying
47
Final-third threat
44
Dribbling
41
Progression
34
Line-breaking
32
Box threat
31
Transition ~proxy
29
Ball-winning
27
Receiving zones
21
Passing directness
20
Creativity
16
Territory (wide vs central)
3
10

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 185 cm / 77 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Santiago Giménez AC Milan · Serie A 25/26 · 185 cm / 79 kg
75%
Driven by: creativity (16%), transition (14%), crossing (9%). Different mechanism — Baldé more via dribbling, carrying; Giménez more via box threat, territory (wide vs central).
Filip Stojilkovic Pisa · Serie A 25/26 · 185 cm / 80 kg
70%
Driven by: receiving zones (13%), transition (13%), ball-winning (13%). Different mechanism — Baldé more via build-up, through-balls; Stojilkovic more via territory (wide vs central), creativity.
William Osula Newcastle · Premier League · 180 cm / 81 kg
68%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (17%), retention (14%), passing directness (12%). Different mechanism — Baldé more via through-balls, line-breaking; Osula more via creativity.
Damion Downs Hamburg · Bundesliga 25/26 · 192 cm / 80 kg
66%
Driven by: creativity (18%), receiving zones (15%), box threat (11%). Different mechanism — Baldé more via defensive aggression, crossing; Downs more via territory (wide vs central).
Luca Moro Sassuolo · Serie A 25/26 · 189 cm
62%
Driven by: creativity (17%), defensive aggression (15%), receiving zones (12%). Different mechanism — Baldé more via carrying; Moro more via territory (wide vs central), ball-winning.
David Mokwa Elversberg · Bundesliga · 181 cm / 81 kg
61%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (16%), receiving zones (14%), creativity (12%). Different mechanism — Baldé more via defensive aggression, crossing; Mokwa more via dribbling, line-breaking.
11

Summary

Ibrahima Baldé is a pressing forward: 1 goals from 0.84 xG (+0.16 vs expected), 7 shots, 1 box entries. A clinical finisher. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]

Based on 6 matches (320 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a pressing forward — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is ball-winning — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall pressing forward profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report