Thin sample this season. Kevin has played 5 matches (101 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Left Wing, Attacking third — mostly in the attacking third (49% of his 35 passes)
83% of touches wide left · 35× in 5/5 matches
↓
CARRY / BEAT MAN
dribble past the full-back, cut inside
33% won · 6× in 2/5 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive the ball into the final third
2.7 progressive · 0.9 f3/90 · 3× in 3/5 matches
Signature: Receive → Carry / Beat Man → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: create / finish — 3× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
9 tracked carries (8.0/90, 3 progressive, 81m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.
progressivelateral/short% of his 9 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 20m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (9)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Dribbles (1v1s)
Only 6 dribbles attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.
02
How does he create chances?
0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
19 defensive actions across the season (16.9/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
4
tackles · 25% won
1
interceptions · 0.9/90
5
recoveries · 4.5/90
0
clearances · 0.0/90
1
blocks
41
avg action height
4
won high (att 3rd)
5
middle third
10
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 10 proactive ball-wins (8.9/90), tackle success 25%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
Defensive work in the attacking half
Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.
8
attacking-half actions · 7.13/90
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Fulham's output per match with Kevin (5 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (5)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals for /match
0.80
1.33
-0.53
xG for /match
1.10
1.72
-0.62
goals against /match
1.40
1.00
+0.40
points /match
0.40
2.00
-1.60
06
His Share of the Team
Of everything Fulham produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Kevin specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
17%
46 / 272
box entries
7%
40 / 556
shots
6%
28 / 458
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 180 wingers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Through-balls ~proxy
95
Dribbling
89
Crossing
85
Ball-winning
83
Carrying
80
Progression
79
Transition ~proxy
77
Final-third threat
75
Line-breaking
73
Passing directness
73
Territory (wide vs central)
73
Press resistance ~proxy
68
Defensive aggression
56
Build-up
54
Box threat
47
Retention
45
Creativity
33
Receiving zones
26
08
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 176 cm / 71 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Jonathan Clauss Nice · Ligue 1 · 178 cm / 69 kg
62%
Driven by: ball-winning (17%), crossing (15%), through-balls (12%). Different mechanism — Kevin more via carrying, dribbling; Clauss more via creativity, build-up.
Anthony Caci Mainz · Bundesliga · 184 cm / 76 kg
61%
Driven by: crossing (17%), ball-winning (15%), through-balls (13%). Different mechanism — Kevin more via carrying, dribbling; Caci more via receiving zones, creativity.
Nicola Zalewski Atalanta · Serie A · 175 cm / 68 kg
59%
Driven by: transition (19%), through-balls (14%), ball-winning (11%). Different mechanism — Kevin more via dribbling, press resistance; Zalewski more via receiving zones, creativity.
Takefusa Kubo Real Sociedad · La Liga · 173 cm / 67 kg
58%
Driven by: dribbling (17%), through-balls (15%), carrying (15%). Different mechanism — Kevin more via territory (wide vs central), progression; Kubo more via receiving zones.
Edon Zhegrova Juventus · Serie A · 181 cm / 66 kg
58%
Driven by: crossing (14%), transition (14%), dribbling (12%). Different mechanism — Kevin more via ball-winning, defensive aggression; Zhegrova more via receiving zones, creativity.
Julian Ryerson Borussia Dortmund · Bundesliga · 183 cm / 86 kg
58%
Driven by: transition (20%), through-balls (12%), final-third threat (12%). Different mechanism — Kevin more via dribbling, press resistance; Ryerson more via creativity, receiving zones.
09
Summary
Kevin is a wide, outside-first left carrier: 83% of dribbles in the wing lane, 71% of passes from wide — but 48% land inside. 2.7 progressive passes and 0.00 key passes /90 plus 0 goals from 0.28 xG. A carry-and-deliver threat.
Based on 5 matches (101 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a wide dribbler / isolator / pressing forward — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is box threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall wide dribbler / isolator profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.