Thin sample this season. Christian Ordóñez has played 6 matches (294 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Central, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (53% of his 114 passes)
89% completion · 114× in 6/6 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
1.2 prog/90 · 4× in 3/6 matches
↓
ARRIVE
get into the box late
4 key passes · 3× in 3/6 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
1.22 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 9× in 3/6 matches
Signature: receive → progress → arrive in the box → create or finish. A box-to-box midfielder judged across every phase.
14
Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?
Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.
own goal left, attacking →
19
passes / match
2.0
dribbles / match
2–47
pass range (matches)
2–2
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (2 at the low end, 47 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
26 tracked carries (8.0/90, 6 progressive, 269m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.
progressivelateral/short% of his 26 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 9m, longest 37m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (15)Second (11)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Dribbles (1v1s)
Only 2 dribbles attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.
03
How does he create chances?
4 key passes (1.22/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (4)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
05
Where Does He Receive?
The zones where Christian Ordóñez gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
17%
Primary
Central, Middle third
12%
Secondary
Left Wing, Middle third
10%
Third
Central, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
06
Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone
Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Christian Ordóñez actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.
Filter:
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches
Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone
Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.
own goal left, attacking →
09
Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete
Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 4 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the middle third: 14% of his 14 touches there are lost (2 times).
04
Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch
Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.
own goal left, attacking →
Across 26 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he carries through central areas (73%). He carries from outside into the middle 1 times and out toward the touchline 3 — a width-holder who drives down the line.
08
What happens right after he carries the ball
Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.
Shot
1 · 4%
Progressive / key pass
3 · 12%
Simple pass
20 · 77%
No clean link
2 · 8%
Of 26 carries, 4% flow straight into a shot of his own, 12% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 8% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
51 defensive actions across the season (15.6/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
7
tackles · 71% won
3
interceptions · 0.9/90
13
recoveries · 4.0/90
10
clearances · 3.1/90
4
blocks
35
avg action height
5
won high (att 3rd)
23
middle third
23
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 23 proactive ball-wins (7.0/90), tackle success 71%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
10
Against Different Pressing Intensities
Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Christian Ordóñez keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.
press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.4, 2m)
0.48
0.7
0.73
50%
Mid press (PPDA 4.4, 2m)
0.60
1.6
1.62
0%
Low press (PPDA 5.5, 2m)
0.73
1.5
1.50
0%
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Parma Calcio 1913's output per match with Christian Ordóñez (6 matches) versus without him (2 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 2 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (6)
WITHOUT (2)
Δ
goals for /match
0.67
0.50
+0.17
xG for /match
0.84
0.77
+0.07
goals against /match
1.67
2.50
-0.83
points /match
0.67
0.00
+0.67
13
His Share of the Team
Of everything Parma Calcio 1913 produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Christian Ordóñez specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
zone-14 entries
7%
9 / 126
tackles
6%
32 / 537
shots
5%
15 / 303
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 383 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Tempo controller37%Deep-lying playmaker30%Transition runner23%Box-to-box runner20%
Why Tempo controller 37%: a weighted blend of retention 52 (weight 35%) + build-up 48 (weight 30%) + press resistance 38 (weight 20%) + progression 8 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
—
Average
defensive aggression, retention, ball-winning, build-up, territory (wide vs central)
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Defensive aggression
53
Retention
52
Ball-winning
49
Build-up
48
Territory (wide vs central)
42
Press resistance ~proxy
38
Crossing
37
Passing directness
31
Box threat
30
Dribbling
28
Receiving zones
24
Creativity
19
Through-balls ~proxy
18
Transition ~proxy
16
Line-breaking
15
Final-third threat
10
Carrying
9
Progression
8
16
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 177 cm / 65 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Aster Vranckx Sassuolo 25/26 · 183 cm / 78 kg
93%
Driven by: progression (14%), transition (13%), final-third threat (13%). Different mechanism — Ordóñez more via box threat.
Malthe Højholt Pisa 25/26 · 182 cm / 65 kg
91%
Driven by: carrying (14%), progression (13%), creativity (12%). Different mechanism — Ordóñez more via receiving zones; Højholt more via passing directness.
Yassin Belkhdim Angers · Ligue 1 · 175 cm / 70 kg
89%
Driven by: progression (12%), carrying (12%), final-third threat (11%). Different mechanism — Ordóñez more via dribbling, press resistance; Belkhdim more via territory (wide vs central), ball-winning.
Alexis Vossah Toulouse · Ligue 1 · 181 cm / 69 kg
88%
Driven by: progression (15%), transition (14%), carrying (13%). Different mechanism — Ordóñez more via ball-winning, crossing; Vossah more via dribbling, press resistance.
Luca Kerber Heidenheim · Bundesliga 25/26 · 180 cm / 77 kg
84%
Driven by: creativity (15%), carrying (14%), progression (13%). Different mechanism — Ordóñez more via retention, press resistance; Kerber more via passing directness, box threat.
Charles Pickel Espanyol · La Liga 25/26 · 187 cm / 78 kg
84%
Driven by: transition (17%), progression (14%), final-third threat (13%). Different mechanism — Ordóñez more via ball-winning, passing directness; Pickel more via dribbling, press resistance.
17
Summary
Christian Ordóñez is a tempo controller: 1.2 progressive passes, 1.22 key passes /90, 3 box entries, 0 goals from 0.25 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.
Based on 6 matches (294 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a tempo controller — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall tempo controller profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.