العربيةSeason20252026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026
DEP

Adrià Alti

Deportivo
Defensive full-back FB
14.4 defensive actions/90 · low final-third share 26%
full-backoverlapping full-backprogressioncrossing
418
minutes
7 apps
81%
pass completion
184 passes
19
progressive passes
4.1/90
16
final-3rd entries
3.4/90
5
box entries
1.08/90
67
defensive actions
14.4/90
14
tackles + interceptions
58% tackle win
12
dribbles
50% won
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Adrià Alti has played 7 matches (418 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Right Wing, Middle third — wide or inverted — mostly in the middle third (49% of his 184 passes)
81% completion · 184× in 7/7 matches
↓
PROGRESS
carry or combine up the flank
4.1 prog/90 · 19× in 6/7 matches
↓
DRIBBLE
beat his man up the line
50% won · 12× in 5/7 matches
↓
DELIVER
cross or cut-back into the box
3 key passes · 5× in 4/7 matches
↓
DEFEND
1v1 and cover on his side
67 def actions · lost 29% deep · 67× in 7/7 matches
Signature: receive wide/inverted → progress the flank → deliver into the box → recover to defend 1v1. Attack the space behind him in transition.
18

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
26
passes / match
14.4
def actions / 90
2–63
pass range (matches)
6
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (2 at the low end, 63 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

06

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

34 tracked carries (7.3/90, 8 progressive, 268m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

6%21%21%35%9%3%3%3%
progressivelateral/short% of his 34 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 6m, longest 21m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
9Outside → Inside
6Inside → Inside
16Outside → Outside
3Inside → Outside
First (20)Second (14)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

12
tackle duels
7
won
5
beaten · 42%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 33%
OUTSIDE 67%
Tackle-duel location — 4 inside · 8 outside
Right Wing
8 · 67%
Right Half-Space
3 · 25%
Central
1 · 8%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 5 of 12 tackle duels (42% loss rate) — a real defensive leak worth flagging.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Does he carry outside (overlap) or inside (invert into midfield)? Every carry by channel. Season rate: 2.58 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 33%
OUTSIDE 67%
Dribble location — 4 inside · 8 outside
Right Wing
8 · 67%
Right Half-Space
4 · 33%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI 67% of his carries are wide — an overlapping full-back who hugs the touchline.
09

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

21%
vertical passes
14×
3%
switches
2×
26%
carries
17×
50%
short circulation
33×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball; he almost never carries (17×), so pressing his passing lanes beats pressing him.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW9738%3745%4414%142%2RHS4436%1627%1227%129%4C714%114%171%5LHS1100%1LW0FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the final third → the right half-space in the final third — 4 progressive passes (19% of his progression) at 0.089 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 81% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 0% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

8% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 8 line-breaking passes and 16 final-third entries, 3.1 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
7%16%18%29%19%4%1%2%2%1%2%1%1%
completedincomplete184 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
184
passes
81%
completed
35
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 81% season completion rate.
08

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

19
progressive · 4.1/90
16
final-third entries · 3.4/90
5
box entries · 1.08/90
16
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
07

How does he create chances?

3 key passes (0.65/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
33%33%33%
chance creation (3)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
10

Where does he become vulnerable?

41 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

17
attacking third (cheap)
12
middle third
12
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 41% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.00 danger-index/90 · 0.339 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
12

What is his passing profile?

184
passes attempted
40%
mostly forward
46%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
74 · 40%
Sideways
55 · 30%
Backward
55 · 30%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
69 · 46%
Medium
69 · 46%
Long (>30m)
11 · 7%
11

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.340.340.280.280.110.09
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.34
Right Wing Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.34
Right Half-Space Mid third → Central Att third
1 passes · 1 to a shot
0.28
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Mid third
5 passes
0.28
Right Wing Att third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes · 1 to a shot
0.11
Right Wing Att third → Right Wing Att third
1 passes
0.09
Right Wing Mid third → Right Wing Att third
1 passes
04

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Adrià Alti gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
32%
Primary
Right Wing, Middle third
19%
Secondary
Right Wing, Attacking third
17%
Third
Right Half-Space, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
05

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Adrià Alti actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
1114415123035563710
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

7%16%18%29%19%4%1%2%2%1%2%1%1%
own goal left, attacking →
13

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

3Key pass
8Cross
1Cutback
19Progressive
26Long ball
9Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
60Outside → Inside
35Inside → Inside
37Outside → Outside
17Inside → Outside
By direction
74Forward
55Backward
55Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays inside from the right wing toward the right hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 passes worth 0.34 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 3 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right hs toward the central, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 33% of his 30 touches there are lost (10 times).
33%10/30 lost17%2/12 lost—4 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few10%6/58 lost10%3/31 lost—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few29%10/35 lost33%3/9 lost—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
03

Crosses & Cutbacks

8 crosses (1.72/90, 3 completed) and 1 cutbacks (0.22/90, 0 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

14

How & where does he defend?

67 defensive actions across the season (14.4/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
12
tackles · 58% won
2
interceptions · 0.4/90
21
recoveries · 4.5/90
6
clearances · 1.3/90
1
blocks
33
avg action height
3
won high (att 3rd)
22
middle third
42
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 35 proactive ball-wins (7.5/90), tackle success 58%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
15

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Adrià Alti still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-3 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 4.1, 2m)
84%
5.5
7.5
1.05
Mid press (PPDA 4.7, 2m)
73%
3.3
7.4
1.38
Low press (PPDA 5.6, 3m)
83%
3.6
3.1
0.74
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

16

Impact on the Team

Deportivo's output per match with Adrià Alti (7 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (7)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals against /match
1.29
1.33
-0.05
points /match
0.86
1.67
-0.81
goals for /match
1.14
1.67
-0.52
xG for /match
1.17
0.91
+0.26
17

His Share of the Team

Of everything Deportivo produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Adrià Alti specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
tackles
6%
13 / 225
successful take-ons
6%
6 / 108
box entries
4%
7 / 160
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

19

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 262 full-backs in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Overlapping full-back59%Inverted full-back50%
Why Overlapping full-back 59%: a weighted blend of dribbling 81 (weight 20%) + final-third threat 63 (weight 25%) + crossing 47 (weight 30%) + transition 51 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
through-balls
Strong
dribbling, defensive aggression, press resistance
Average
retention, final-third threat, passing directness, line-breaking, ball-winning, transition, crossing, build-up
Weak
progression, carrying, creativity, receiving zones, territory (wide vs central), box threat
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Through-balls ~proxy
89
Dribbling
81
Defensive aggression
75
Press resistance ~proxy
72
Retention
69
Final-third threat
63
Passing directness
63
Line-breaking
62
Ball-winning
60
Transition ~proxy
51
Crossing
47
Build-up
41
Progression
36
Carrying
33
Creativity
32
Receiving zones
27
Territory (wide vs central)
26
Box threat
23
20

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 170 cm / 62 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Andoni Gorosabel Athletic Club · 174 cm / 70 kg
72%
Driven by: press resistance (15%), dribbling (11%), box threat (11%). Different mechanism — Alti more via through-balls, passing directness; Gorosabel more via receiving zones, progression.
Mateu Morey Mallorca 25/26 · 173 cm / 67 kg
52%
Driven by: defensive aggression (21%), through-balls (19%), carrying (11%). Different mechanism — Alti more via retention, transition; Morey more via receiving zones, box threat.
Ki-Jana Hoever Wolves · Premier League 25/26 · 183 cm / 65 kg
50%
Driven by: through-balls (18%), dribbling (17%), box threat (10%). Different mechanism — Alti more via retention, build-up; Hoever more via territory (wide vs central), progression.
Pablo Maffeo Valencia · 172 cm / 70 kg
46%
Driven by: dribbling (20%), through-balls (20%), box threat (15%). Different mechanism — Alti more via retention, defensive aggression; Maffeo more via territory (wide vs central), receiving zones.
Joseph Kalulu Angers · Ligue 1 · 178 cm / 70 kg
46%
Driven by: box threat (19%), receiving zones (16%), dribbling (16%). Different mechanism — Alti more via line-breaking, passing directness; Kalulu more via territory (wide vs central), carrying.
Marius Louër Angers · Ligue 1 · 181 cm / 70 kg
45%
Driven by: box threat (15%), receiving zones (15%), press resistance (13%). Different mechanism — Alti more via through-balls, line-breaking; Louër more via build-up.
21

Summary

Adrià Alti is an overlapping full-back: 4.1 progressive passes and 5 box entries, delivering 3 key passes. Overlap-first full-back. [1v1 recovery pace and off-ball overlap timing need tracking.]

Based on 7 matches (418 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an overlapping full-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is crossing — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall overlapping full-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report