العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2025/26

Andrey Santos

Man Utd
Ball-winning 6 (destroyer) DM
12.1 defensive actions/90
defensive midtempo controllerpress resistancescreening
1371
minutes
27 apps
799
passes
90% completed
90%
pass completion
799 passes
39
progressive passes
2.6/90
184
defensive actions
12.1/90
57
tackles + interceptions
51% tackle win
48
recoveries
3.2/90
29
line-breaking passes
1.9/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
drop between the centre-backs — mostly in the middle third (64% of his 799 passes)
90% completion · 799× in 27/27 matches
↓
PROGRESS CENTRAL
break a line through the middle
2.6 prog/90 · 29× in 16/27 matches
↓
SCREEN / WIN BALL
protect the back four
6.9 ball-wins/90 · 105× in 27/27 matches
↓
RECYCLE / PROGRESS
keep it ticking, feed the final third
3.7 f3-entries/90 · 57× in 18/27 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress Central → Screen / Win Ball → Recycle / Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: escape pressure — 8× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
30
passes / match
12.1
def actions / 90
2–83
pass range (matches)
21
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (2 at the low end, 83 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

11

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

131 tracked carries (8.6/90, 16 progressive, 998m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

6%10%8%1%14%28%14%2%1%5%6%6%1%
progressivelateral/short% of his 131 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 6m, longest 26m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
6Outside → Inside
112Inside → Inside
10Outside → Outside
3Inside → Outside
First (38)Second (35)Third (35)Fourth (23)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

37
tackle duels
19
won
18
beaten · 49%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 65%
OUTSIDE 35%
Tackle-duel location — 24 inside · 13 outside
Right Wing
6 · 16%
Right Half-Space
8 · 22%
Central
8 · 22%
Left Half-Space
8 · 22%
Left Wing
7 · 19%
Vision AI beaten in 18 of 37 tackle duels (49% loss rate) — a real defensive leak worth flagging.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Can he escape pressure on the ball? His carries/dribbles in tight central areas, by channel. Season rate: 0.53 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 75%
OUTSIDE 25%
Dribble location — 6 inside · 2 outside
Right Wing
1 · 12%
Right Half-Space
1 · 12%
Central
4 · 50%
Left Half-Space
1 · 12%
Left Wing
1 · 12%
Vision AI 75% of his carries are central — he receives and turns in congested midfield zones rather than out wide.
02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

6%
vertical passes
24×
2%
switches
7×
23%
carries
91×
69%
short circulation
269×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW4257%2436%157%3RHS12428%3537%4627%337%91%1C3046%1821%6345%13623%715%16LHS2055%1036%7335%7125%51LW439%442%1849%21FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: central areas in the middle third → central areas in the final third — 6 progressive passes (16% of his progression) at 0.062 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.

His progression is inward: 41% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 3% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 3% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 16 line-breaking passes and 57 final-third entries, 6.5 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%4%5%5%3%0%1%12%18%17%5%1%1%4%9%10%3%0%
completedincomplete799 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
799
passes
90%
completed
81
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 90% season completion rate.
03

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

39
progressive · 2.6/90
57
final-third entries · 3.7/90
9
box entries · 0.59/90
13
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

8 key passes (0.53/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
12%25%12%12%12%12%12%
chance creation (8)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
06

Where does he become vulnerable?

87 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

16
attacking third (cheap)
45
middle third
26
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 18% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.29 danger-index/90 · 0.402 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05

What is his passing profile?

799
passes attempted
42%
mostly sideways
64%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
318 · 40%
Sideways
337 · 42%
Backward
144 · 18%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
460 · 64%
Medium
242 · 34%
Long (>30m)
16 · 2%
07

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.570.290.260.240.200.19
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.57
Right Half-Space Att third → Right Half-Space Att third
2 passes · 1 to a shot
0.29
Right Half-Space Def third → Right Half-Space Mid third
3 passes
0.26
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
3 passes
0.24
Left Half-Space Att third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.20
Central Att third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.19
Central Mid third → Central Mid third
2 passes
09

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Andrey Santos gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
26%
Primary
Central, Middle third
19%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
11%
Third
Right Half-Space, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
10

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Andrey Santos actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
1132718126279514514044134373843263
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%4%5%5%3%0%1%12%18%17%5%1%1%4%9%10%3%0%
own goal left, attacking →
08

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

8Key pass
2Cross
1Cutback
39Progressive
29Long ball
12Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
40Outside → Inside
512Inside → Inside
45Outside → Outside
121Inside → Outside
By direction
318Forward
144Backward
337Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
04

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the right hs in the final third — 2 passes worth 0.57 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 8 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he switches it out from the right hs to the right wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 33% of his 12 touches there are lost (4 times).
8%1/12 lost14%5/36 lost9%7/80 lost14%6/42 lost33%4/12 lost22%6/27 lost8%7/85 lost4%9/207 lost6%9/153 lost29%12/41 lost17%2/12 lost25%5/20 lost8%3/36 lost17%5/30 lost—6 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

184 defensive actions across the season (12.1/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
37
tackles · 51% won
20
interceptions · 1.3/90
48
recoveries · 3.2/90
21
clearances · 1.4/90
16
blocks
41
avg action height
22
won high (att 3rd)
85
middle third
77
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 105 proactive ball-wins (6.9/90), tackle success 51%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Andrey Santos still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~9-9 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 6.0, 9m)
91%
2.4
2.2
0.66
Mid press (PPDA 8.2, 9m)
85%
1.6
1.2
0.72
Low press (PPDA 12.2, 9m)
93%
3.8
2.3
1.42
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Man Utd's output per match with Andrey Santos (27 matches) versus without him (11 matches). What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (27)
WITHOUT (11)
Δ
goals against /match
1.37
1.36
+0.01
points /match
1.48
1.09
+0.39
goals for /match
1.74
1.00
+0.74
xG for /match
1.69
1.32
+0.37
16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Man Utd produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Andrey Santos specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
zone-14 entries
6%
28 / 444
tackles
6%
46 / 783
interceptions
5%
23 / 473
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 258 defensive mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Tempo controller68%Deep-lying playmaker64%Ball-winning 660%
Why Tempo controller 68%: a weighted blend of build-up 87 (weight 30%) + retention 69 (weight 35%) + progression 48 (weight 15%) + press resistance 32 (weight 20%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
build-up, receiving zones
Strong
passing directness
Average
retention, defensive aggression, box threat, creativity, transition, final-third threat, ball-winning, line-breaking, progression, carrying
Weak
press resistance, crossing, through-balls, territory (wide vs central), dribbling
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Build-up
87
Receiving zones
86
Passing directness
75
Retention
69
Defensive aggression
67
Box threat
63
Creativity
54
Transition ~proxy
52
Final-third threat
51
Ball-winning
51
Line-breaking
49
Progression
48
Carrying
45
Press resistance ~proxy
32
Crossing
30
Through-balls ~proxy
26
Territory (wide vs central)
5
Dribbling
4
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 180 cm / 75 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Senne Lynen Werder Bremen · Bundesliga · 185 cm / 80 kg
74%
Driven by: build-up (28%), dribbling (24%), territory (wide vs central) (17%). Different mechanism — Santos more via box threat, defensive aggression; Lynen more via through-balls, progression.
Aurélien Tchouaméni Real Madrid · La Liga · 187 cm / 81 kg
71%
Driven by: dribbling (21%), territory (wide vs central) (17%), receiving zones (14%). Different mechanism — Santos more via build-up; Tchouaméni more via through-balls, final-third threat.
Pierre Lees-Melou Paris FC · Ligue 1 · 185 cm / 69 kg
70%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (19%), dribbling (15%), build-up (14%). Different mechanism — Santos more via build-up, retention; Lees-Melou more via dribbling, territory (wide vs central).
Al Musrati Hellas Verona · Serie A 25/26 · 189 cm / 80 kg
66%
Driven by: dribbling (27%), territory (wide vs central) (18%), crossing (15%). Different mechanism — Santos more via line-breaking, retention; Musrati more via transition.
Matías Vecino Lazio · Serie A 25/26 · 187 cm / 81 kg
62%
Driven by: dribbling (27%), through-balls (14%), build-up (14%). Different mechanism — Santos more via passing directness, line-breaking; Vecino more via territory (wide vs central).
Casemiro Man Utd 25/26 · 185 cm / 84 kg
62%
Driven by: dribbling (19%), build-up (13%), territory (wide vs central) (12%). Different mechanism — Santos more via retention, build-up; Casemiro more via through-balls, line-breaking.
20

Summary

Andrey Santos is a tempo controller / deep-lying playmaker: 90% completion, 29 line-breaks and 2.6 progressive passes /90, resisting pressure with 25% dribble success. A central controller. [Off-ball screening position and scanning need tracking data.]

Based on 27 matches (1371 minutes) — a reasonable read, still building toward a full-season sample. He profiles as a tempo controller / deep-lying playmaker — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is press resistance — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall tempo controller profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report