His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Left Wing, Attacking third — between the lines — mostly in the middle third (44% of his 78 passes)
74% completion · 78× in 6/6 matches
↓
TURN / BEAT MAN
face forward in the pocket
71% won · 7× in 5/6 matches
↓
FINISH
arrive and shoot from central zones
1 goals · 0.17 xG · 3× in 3/6 matches
Signature: Receive → Turn / Beat Man → Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: create — 1× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
22 tracked carries (11.1/90, 5 progressive, 240m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.
progressivelateral/short% of his 22 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 10m, longest 27m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (22)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Dribbles (1v1s)
Only 7 dribbles attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.
02
How does he create chances?
1 key passes (0.51/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
05
Where does he become vulnerable?
22 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.
13
attacking third (cheap)
5
middle third
4
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 59% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.71 danger-index/90 · 0.243 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
04
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right wing toward the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the final third: 47% of his 15 touches there are lost (7 times).
Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Isak Jensen keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.
press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 4.0, 2m)
0.57
2.0
1.02
67%
Mid press (PPDA 4.7, 2m)
0.64
3.2
0.00
50%
Low press (PPDA 8.7, 2m)
1.14
2.7
0.00
100%
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Lorient's output per match with Isak Jensen (6 matches) versus without him (2 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 2 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (6)
WITHOUT (2)
Δ
goals for /match
1.00
0.50
+0.50
xG for /match
0.80
0.00
+0.80
goals against /match
1.00
0.00
+1.00
points /match
1.33
2.00
-0.67
08
His Share of the Team
Of everything Lorient produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Isak Jensen specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
goals
17%
1 / 6
successful take-ons
3%
5 / 190
shots
1%
3 / 241
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Isak Jensen is an attacking mid: 0.51 key passes /90, 2.5 progressive passes, 1 goals from 0.17 xG. A between-the-lines creator. [Off-ball movement into pockets needs tracking.]
Based on 6 matches (178 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an attacking mid — best used in a system built around that identity.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
