His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
Signature: Link → Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: receive / move — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); convert — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
20 defensive actions across the season (11.9/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
0
tackles · 0% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
2
recoveries · 1.2/90
0
clearances · 0.0/90
1
blocks
61
avg action height
6
won high (att 3rd)
13
middle third
1
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 2 proactive ball-wins (1.2/90), tackle success 0%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
Defensive work in the attacking half
Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.
16
attacking-half actions · 9.54/90
02
Against Different Pressing Intensities
Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Lewis Koumas keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.
press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.3, 2m)
0.28
0.0
0.00
0%
Mid press (PPDA 4.4, 2m)
0.14
0.0
0.00
33%
Low press (PPDA 5.3, 2m)
0.10
0.0
0.00
0%
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Liverpool's output per match with Lewis Koumas (6 matches) versus without him (2 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 2 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (6)
WITHOUT (2)
Δ
goals for /match
1.50
1.00
+0.50
xG for /match
1.51
1.39
+0.12
goals against /match
1.00
1.00
+0.00
points /match
2.17
1.00
+1.17
05
His Share of the Team
Of everything Liverpool produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Lewis Koumas specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
shots
1%
4 / 706
expected goals (xG)
1%
0.3 / 66.1
zone-14 entries
0%
2 / 438
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Lewis Koumas is a striker: 0 goals from 0.33 xG (-0.33 vs expected), 4 shots, 0 box entries. Under-performing his chances. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]
Based on 6 matches (151 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a striker — best used in a system built around that identity.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
