Thin sample this season. Estêvão has played 6 matches (85 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Right Wing, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (58% of his 26 passes)
100% of touches wide right · 26× in 6/6 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive the ball into the final third
3.2 progressive · 2.1 f3/90 · 3× in 3/6 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry / beat man — 1× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); create / finish — 3× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Estêvão keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.
press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.9, 2m)
0.82
2.2
0.00
0%
Mid press (PPDA 4.9, 2m)
0.18
3.8
0.00
0%
Low press (PPDA 5.8, 2m)
0.78
4.3
0.00
0%
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Chelsea's output per match with Estêvão (6 matches) versus without him (2 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 2 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (6)
WITHOUT (2)
Δ
goals for /match
1.83
3.00
-1.17
xG for /match
0.89
2.03
-1.14
goals against /match
2.00
1.50
+0.50
points /match
1.17
3.00
-1.83
04
His Share of the Team
Of everything Chelsea produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Estêvão specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
6%
29 / 468
shots
4%
31 / 733
expected goals (xG)
4%
3.2 / 82.2
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 180 wingers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
carrying, transition, territory (wide vs central), passing directness
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Box threat
80
Dribbling
70
Crossing
67
Defensive aggression
66
Receiving zones
64
Retention
62
Press resistance ~proxy
62
Creativity
60
Ball-winning
50
Build-up
47
Through-balls ~proxy
46
Line-breaking
43
Progression
43
Final-third threat
41
Carrying
36
Transition ~proxy
32
Territory (wide vs central)
19
Passing directness
16
06
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 178 cm / 62 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Franco Mastantuono Fiorentina · Serie A · 178 cm / 74 kg
75%
Driven by: box threat (16%), transition (16%), passing directness (12%). Different mechanism — Mastantuono more via receiving zones, through-balls.
Ademola Lookman Atletico · La Liga · 174 cm / 71 kg
70%
Driven by: box threat (21%), territory (wide vs central) (19%), passing directness (18%). Different mechanism — Estêvão more via dribbling, ball-winning; Lookman more via receiving zones.
Rafael Leão AC Milan · Serie A 25/26 · 188 cm / 80 kg
66%
Driven by: transition (22%), box threat (19%), territory (wide vs central) (19%). Different mechanism — Estêvão more via ball-winning, dribbling; Leão more via retention.
Omar Marmoush Tottenham · 180 cm / 80 kg
60%
Driven by: transition (19%), territory (wide vs central) (15%), passing directness (13%). Different mechanism — Estêvão more via crossing, line-breaking; Marmoush more via retention.
Matias Fernandez-Pardo Newcastle · 188 cm / 86 kg
58%
Driven by: transition (20%), box threat (16%), passing directness (15%). Different mechanism — Estêvão more via ball-winning, build-up.
Jonathan Ikoné Paris FC · Ligue 1 · 175 cm / 67 kg
55%
Driven by: transition (19%), passing directness (18%), territory (wide vs central) (16%). Different mechanism — Estêvão more via through-balls, box threat; Ikoné more via build-up, retention.
07
Summary
Estêvão is a wide, outside-first right carrier: 100% of dribbles in the wing lane, 58% of passes from wide — but 63% land inside. 3.2 progressive passes and 0.00 key passes /90 plus 0 goals from 0.18 xG. A carry-and-deliver threat.
Based on 6 matches (85 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a wide dribbler / isolator / inside forward — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is final-third threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall wide dribbler / isolator profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
