His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
drop between the centre-backs — mostly in the middle third (55% of his 508 passes)
84% completion · 508× in 8/8 matches
↓
ESCAPE PRESSURE
turn out of a tight central area
41% won · 17× in 7/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS CENTRAL
break a line through the middle
5.0 prog/90 · 60× in 8/8 matches
↓
SCREEN / WIN BALL
protect the back four
8.5 ball-wins/90 · 70× in 8/8 matches
↓
RECYCLE / PROGRESS
keep it ticking, feed the final third
3.8 f3-entries/90 · 31× in 8/8 matches
Signature: drop to receive → escape the press on the turn → progress centrally or recycle → screen the counter. Block the central lane and press his first touch to force him backwards.
17
Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?
Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.
own goal left, attacking →
64
passes / match
14.5
def actions / 90
44–85
pass range (matches)
10
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (44 at the low end, 85 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
134 tracked carries (16.2/90, 27 progressive, 1225m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.
progressivelateral/short% of his 134 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 38m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (45)Second (35)Third (32)Fourth (22)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Beaten in the tackle
How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).
11
tackle duels
10
won
1
beaten · 9%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 73%
OUTSIDE 27%
Tackle-duel location — 8 inside · 3 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
2 · 18%
Central
4 · 36%
Left Half-Space
2 · 18%
Left Wing
3 · 27%
Vision AI beaten in 1 of 11 tackle duels (9% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →
Dribbles (1v1s)
Can he escape pressure on the ball? His carries/dribbles in tight central areas, by channel. Season rate: 2.06 dribbles attempted /90.
brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 82%
OUTSIDE 18%
Dribble location — 14 inside · 3 outside
Right Wing
2 · 12%
Right Half-Space
1 · 6%
Central
8 · 47%
Left Half-Space
5 · 29%
Left Wing
1 · 6%
Vision AI 82% of his carries are central — he receives and turns in congested midfield zones rather than out wide.
02
How does he build & move the ball?
How does he escape the first line?
12%
vertical passes
30×
7%
switches
19×
37%
carries
96×
44%
short circulation
114×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.
How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.
own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.
Primary route: central areas in the middle third → the right half-space in the middle third — 3 progressive passes (11% of his progression) at -0.005 xT each. He works it wider.
Inward (33%) and outward (26%) progression are balanced — no strong lane bias.
11% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.
Quality behind the volume: 9 line-breaking passes and 31 final-third entries, 0.0 total xT added.
Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter:fromto
completedincomplete508 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
508
passes
84%
completed
81
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete91 passes · any zone → Right Wing · own goal left, attacking →
91
passes
82%
completed
16
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete80 passes · any zone → Right Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
80
passes
76%
completed
19
lost
Vision AI76% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete132 passes · any zone → Central · own goal left, attacking →
132
passes
88%
completed
16
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete86 passes · any zone → Left Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
86
passes
79%
completed
18
lost
Vision AI79% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete119 passes · any zone → Left Wing · own goal left, attacking →
119
passes
90%
completed
12
lost
Vision AI90% here vs 84% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete132 passes · any zone → Defensive 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
132
passes
94%
completed
8
lost
Vision AI94% here vs 84% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete258 passes · any zone → Middle 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
258
passes
86%
completed
35
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete118 passes · any zone → Attacking 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
118
passes
68%
completed
38
lost
Vision AI68% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete34 passes · Right Wing → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
34
passes
76%
completed
8
lost
Vision AI76% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete24 passes · Right Wing → Right Wing · own goal left, attacking →
24
passes
71%
completed
7
lost
Vision AI71% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete7 passes · Right Wing → Right Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
7
passes
86%
completed
1
lost
completedincomplete3 passes · Right Wing → Central · own goal left, attacking →
3
passes
100%
completed
0
lost
completedincomplete0 passes · Right Wing → Left Half-Space · own goal left, attacking → — no passes matched this route
0
passes
0%
completed
0
lost
completedincomplete0 passes · Right Wing → Left Wing · own goal left, attacking → — no passes matched this route
0
passes
0%
completed
0
lost
completedincomplete12 passes · Right Wing → Defensive 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
12
passes
83%
completed
2
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete12 passes · Right Wing → Middle 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
12
passes
67%
completed
4
lost
Vision AI67% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete10 passes · Right Wing → Attacking 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
10
passes
80%
completed
2
lost
Vision AI80% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete99 passes · Right Half-Space → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
99
passes
85%
completed
15
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete34 passes · Right Half-Space → Right Wing · own goal left, attacking →
34
passes
85%
completed
5
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete17 passes · Right Half-Space → Right Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
17
passes
59%
completed
7
lost
Vision AI59% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete33 passes · Right Half-Space → Central · own goal left, attacking →
33
passes
97%
completed
1
lost
Vision AI97% here vs 84% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete9 passes · Right Half-Space → Left Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
9
passes
100%
completed
0
lost
completedincomplete6 passes · Right Half-Space → Left Wing · own goal left, attacking →
6
passes
67%
completed
2
lost
completedincomplete26 passes · Right Half-Space → Defensive 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
26
passes
92%
completed
2
lost
Vision AI92% here vs 84% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete48 passes · Right Half-Space → Middle 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
48
passes
88%
completed
6
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete25 passes · Right Half-Space → Attacking 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
25
passes
72%
completed
7
lost
Vision AI72% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete180 passes · Central → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
180
passes
88%
completed
21
lost
Vision AI88% here vs 84% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete27 passes · Central → Right Wing · own goal left, attacking →
27
passes
93%
completed
2
lost
Vision AI93% here vs 84% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete41 passes · Central → Right Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
41
passes
83%
completed
7
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete54 passes · Central → Central · own goal left, attacking →
54
passes
85%
completed
8
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete29 passes · Central → Left Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
29
passes
93%
completed
2
lost
Vision AI93% here vs 84% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete29 passes · Central → Left Wing · own goal left, attacking →
29
passes
93%
completed
2
lost
Vision AI93% here vs 84% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete45 passes · Central → Defensive 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
45
passes
98%
completed
1
lost
Vision AI98% here vs 84% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete101 passes · Central → Middle 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
101
passes
92%
completed
8
lost
Vision AI92% here vs 84% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete34 passes · Central → Attacking 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
34
passes
65%
completed
12
lost
Vision AI65% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete154 passes · Left Half-Space → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
154
passes
81%
completed
30
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete4 passes · Left Half-Space → Right Wing · own goal left, attacking →
4
passes
50%
completed
2
lost
completedincomplete13 passes · Left Half-Space → Right Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
13
passes
77%
completed
3
lost
Vision AI77% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete37 passes · Left Half-Space → Central · own goal left, attacking →
37
passes
81%
completed
7
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete41 passes · Left Half-Space → Left Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
41
passes
68%
completed
13
lost
Vision AI68% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete59 passes · Left Half-Space → Left Wing · own goal left, attacking →
59
passes
92%
completed
5
lost
Vision AI92% here vs 84% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete36 passes · Left Half-Space → Defensive 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
36
passes
92%
completed
3
lost
Vision AI92% here vs 84% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete82 passes · Left Half-Space → Middle 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
82
passes
84%
completed
13
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete36 passes · Left Half-Space → Attacking 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
36
passes
61%
completed
14
lost
Vision AI61% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete41 passes · Left Wing → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
41
passes
83%
completed
7
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete2 passes · Left Wing → Right Wing · own goal left, attacking →
2
passes
100%
completed
0
lost
completedincomplete2 passes · Left Wing → Right Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
2
passes
50%
completed
1
lost
completedincomplete5 passes · Left Wing → Central · own goal left, attacking →
5
passes
100%
completed
0
lost
completedincomplete7 passes · Left Wing → Left Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
7
passes
57%
completed
3
lost
completedincomplete25 passes · Left Wing → Left Wing · own goal left, attacking →
25
passes
88%
completed
3
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete13 passes · Left Wing → Defensive 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
13
passes
100%
completed
0
lost
Vision AI100% here vs 84% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete15 passes · Left Wing → Middle 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
15
passes
73%
completed
4
lost
Vision AI73% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete13 passes · Left Wing → Attacking 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
13
passes
77%
completed
3
lost
Vision AI77% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete149 passes · Defensive 3rd → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
149
passes
85%
completed
23
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete34 passes · Defensive 3rd → Right Wing · own goal left, attacking →
34
passes
82%
completed
6
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete25 passes · Defensive 3rd → Right Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
25
passes
80%
completed
5
lost
Vision AI80% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete41 passes · Defensive 3rd → Central · own goal left, attacking →
41
passes
88%
completed
5
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 84% season completion rate.
completedincomplete20 passes · Defensive 3rd → Left Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
20
passes
70%
completed
6
lost
Vision AI70% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete29 passes · Defensive 3rd → Left Wing · own goal left, attacking →
29
passes
97%
completed
1
lost
Vision AI97% here vs 84% for the season — a safer zone for him.
Vision AI78% here vs 84% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
03
How does he progress play?
How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.
41
progressive · 5.0/90
31
final-third entries · 3.8/90
3
box entries · 0.36/90
19
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
11
How does he create chances?
4 key passes (0.48/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (4)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
05
Where does he become vulnerable?
91 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.
17
attacking third (cheap)
49
middle third
25
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 19% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 4.59 danger-index/90 · 0.417 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
06
What is his passing profile?
508
passes attempted
44%
mostly forward
47%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
221 · 44%
Sideways
156 · 31%
Backward
131 · 26%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
187 · 44%
Medium
199 · 47%
Long (>30m)
41 · 10%
07
Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted
His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.39
Central Mid third → Central Att third
2 passes
0.32
Central Mid third → Right Wing Att third
3 passes
0.32
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
3 passes
0.31
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Att third
3 passes
0.29
Central Mid third → Right Half-Space Mid third
3 passes
0.25
Central Mid third → Central Mid third
3 passes
08
Where Does He Receive?
The zones where Noah Cadiou gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
23%
Primary
Central, Middle third
15%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
12%
Third
Right Half-Space, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
09
Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone
Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Noah Cadiou actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.
Filter:
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches
Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone
Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.
own goal left, attacking →
12
Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete
Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the central, advancing it forward in the middle third — 2 passes worth 0.39 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 4 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he switches it out from the right hs to the right wing, advancing it forward in the defensive third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the middle third: 44% of his 9 touches there are lost (4 times).
120 defensive actions across the season (14.5/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
11
tackles · 91% won
9
interceptions · 1.1/90
50
recoveries · 6.0/90
10
clearances · 1.2/90
5
blocks
36
avg action height
10
won high (att 3rd)
41
middle third
69
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 70 proactive ball-wins (8.5/90), tackle success 91%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
14
Can he play under pressure?
Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Noah Cadiou still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.
press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 4.0, 2m)
87%
4.2
7.5
0.71
Mid press (PPDA 4.4, 2m)
84%
3.3
2.9
0.83
Low press (PPDA 6.8, 4m)
83%
6.2
9.4
1.07
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Insufficient sample: Noah Cadiou played nearly every Lorient match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.
16
His Share of the Team
Of everything Lorient produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Noah Cadiou specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
zone-14 entries
20%
27 / 133
ball recoveries
16%
162 / 1016
final-third entries
15%
148 / 961
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 258 defensive mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
ball-winning, defensive aggression, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Carrying
92
Transition ~proxy
80
Build-up
77
Box threat
71
Passing directness
65
Progression
64
Retention
63
Receiving zones
63
Creativity
62
Final-third threat
60
Press resistance ~proxy
60
Dribbling
60
Through-balls ~proxy
53
Crossing
51
Line-breaking
51
Ball-winning
36
Defensive aggression
21
Territory (wide vs central)
20
19
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 191 cm / 84 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Pierre-Emile Højbjerg Marseille · 187 cm / 81 kg
74%
Driven by: transition (18%), carrying (16%), box threat (10%). Different mechanism — Højbjerg more via passing directness, defensive aggression.
Ellyes Skhiri Koln · Bundesliga · 185 cm / 74 kg
73%
Driven by: build-up (22%), carrying (19%), transition (15%). Different mechanism — Cadiou more via box threat; Skhiri more via defensive aggression, retention.
Nemanja Matic Sassuolo · Serie A · 194 cm / 85 kg
72%
Driven by: transition (21%), carrying (18%), build-up (14%). Different mechanism — Cadiou more via box threat; Matic more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking.
Éderson Atalanta · Serie A · 183 cm / 83 kg
72%
Driven by: carrying (18%), transition (14%), box threat (13%). Different mechanism — Cadiou more via passing directness; Éderson more via receiving zones, defensive aggression.
Leon Goretzka Aston Villa · Premier League · 189 cm / 82 kg
70%
Driven by: carrying (19%), box threat (11%), territory (wide vs central) (9%). Different mechanism — Cadiou more via passing directness, transition; Goretzka more via receiving zones, retention.
Laurent Abergel Lorient 25/26 · 185 cm / 65 kg
66%
Driven by: defensive aggression (19%), build-up (18%), transition (17%). Different mechanism — Cadiou more via dribbling, box threat; Abergel more via passing directness.
20
Summary
Noah Cadiou is a deep-lying playmaker / tempo controller: 84% completion, 60 line-breaks and 5.0 progressive passes /90, resisting pressure with 41% dribble success. A central controller. [Off-ball screening position and scanning need tracking data.]
Based on 8 matches (744 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a deep-lying playmaker / tempo controller — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is press resistance — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall deep-lying playmaker profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.