العربيةSeason20252026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Luka Vuskovic

Brighton
Ball-playing centre-back CB
4.9 progressive passes/90 · 1.0 line-breaking/90
Capability Analysis
Aerial & Box Defending49%vs 50 centre-backs
"Can he win the individual defensive battle in his own box?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
Clearances /908.2298%
Ball-Winning70%vs 50 centre-backs
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /901.2880%
Ball recoveries /904.2390%
Tackles /900.8214%
Duels won /904.7198%
Breaking Pressure
only 22 pressured-passing actions across 1 high-press match -- not enough sample (needs 5+ matches and 12+ actions)
Progression44%vs 50 centre-backs
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /902.7938%
Line-breaking passes /900.8256%
Threat added by passing /900.92xT40%
Pass accuracy84.72%42%
Ball-Carrying63%vs 50 centre-backs
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /905.7254%
Carry distance /90145.1m72%
centre-backball-playing centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
742
minutes
8 apps
533
passes
89% completed
89%
pass completion
533 passes
40
progressive passes
4.9/90
57
line-breaking passes
6.9/90
181
defensive actions
22.0/90
17
tackles + interceptions
67% tackle win
54
clearances
6.5/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (64% of his 533 passes)
89% completion · 533× in 8/8 matches
↓
CARRY OUT
step into midfield to commit a presser
3 carries · 6× in 3/8 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
4.9 prog/90 · 57× in 8/8 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 32× in 8/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
4.9/90 · 40× in 8/8 matches
Signature: receive in the first line → break the midfield line vertically → switch or progress. Press him early and shut the vertical lane to force the safe sideways ball.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
67
passes / match
22.0
def actions / 90
24–103
pass range (matches)
54
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (24 at the low end, 103 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

09

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

160 tracked carries (19.4/90, 22 progressive, 1302m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

4%16%21%12%10%18%12%1%3%2%1%1%
progressivelateral/short% of his 160 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 30m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
14Outside → Inside
125Inside → Inside
16Outside → Outside
5Inside → Outside
First (65)Second (46)Third (32)Fourth (17)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

9
tackle duels
6
won
3
beaten · 33%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 67%
OUTSIDE 33%
Tackle-duel location — 6 inside · 3 outside
Right Wing
3 · 33%
Right Half-Space
3 · 33%
Central
2 · 22%
Left Half-Space
1 · 11%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 3 of 9 tackle duels (33% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 3 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

8%
vertical passes
26×
6%
switches
22×
35%
carries
117×
51%
short circulation
174×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW7236%2621%1539%281%13%2RHS24227%6516%3840%9616%392%4C1288%1021%2728%3637%476%8LHS264%165%178%223%6LW922%222%256%5FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the middle third → the right half-space in the middle third — 3 progressive passes (18% of his progression) at 0.033 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 35% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 6% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

13% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 8 line-breaking passes and 40 final-third entries, 4.8 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
5%16%18%13%2%1%7%18%11%2%0%0%3%2%1%0%
completedincomplete533 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
533
passes
89%
completed
56
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

40
progressive · 4.9/90
40
final-third entries · 4.9/90
1
box entries · 0.12/90
17
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

1 key passes (0.12/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
100%
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
06

Where does he become vulnerable?

57 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

7
attacking third (cheap)
32
middle third
18
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 12% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.99 danger-index/90 · 0.432 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05

What is his passing profile?

533
passes attempted
43%
mostly forward
50%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
229 · 43%
Sideways
204 · 38%
Backward
100 · 19%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
195 · 41%
Medium
240 · 50%
Long (>30m)
42 · 9%
10

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.350.320.280.240.230.22
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.35
Right Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.32
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Mid third
6 passes
0.28
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
2 passes
0.24
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Att third
3 passes
0.23
Right Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
3 passes
0.22
Right Half-Space Def third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
07

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Luka Vuskovic gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
31%
Primary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
18%
Secondary
Central, Middle third
16%
Third
Right Half-Space, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
08

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Luka Vuskovic actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
2141331437996117122588966712
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

5%16%18%13%2%1%7%18%11%2%0%0%3%2%1%0%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

1Key pass
2Cross
1Cutback
40Progressive
57Long ball
32Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
48Outside → Inside
303Inside → Inside
33Outside → Outside
93Inside → Outside
By direction
229Forward
100Backward
204Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches from the right hs to the left hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 passes worth 0.35 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right wing toward the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the final third: 38% of his 8 touches there are lost (3 times).
21%7/34 lost5%4/84 lost12%4/33 lost20%2/10 lost—6 touches · too few15%7/47 lost7%11/167 lost9%9/99 lost10%2/20 lost—6 touches · too few38%3/8 lost—7 touches · too few18%2/11 lost—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

181 defensive actions across the season (22.0/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
9
tackles · 67% won
8
interceptions · 1.0/90
33
recoveries · 4.0/90
54
clearances · 6.5/90
6
blocks
32
avg action height
13
won high (att 3rd)
67
middle third
101
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by clearing and blocking — a reactive, protect-the-box profile. 50 proactive ball-wins (6.1/90), tackle success 67%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Luka Vuskovic still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 4.3, 2m)
73%
1.4
4.7
0.33
Mid press (PPDA 5.8, 2m)
88%
5.3
6.8
1.03
Low press (PPDA 8.3, 4m)
93%
6.4
8.1
1.45
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Luka Vuskovic played nearly every Brighton match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Brighton produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Luka Vuskovic specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
24%
309 / 1285
interceptions
13%
48 / 371
expected goals (xG)
10%
5.2 / 52.3
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 515 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-playing centre-back63%Stopper centre-back55%
Why Ball-playing centre-back 63%: a weighted blend of build-up 66 (weight 30%) + retention 55 (weight 30%) + progression 49 (weight 25%) + press resistance 67 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
box threat
Strong
dribbling
Average
carrying, press resistance, build-up, transition, line-breaking, ball-winning, receiving zones, retention, creativity, progression, defensive aggression, final-third threat
Weak
passing directness, through-balls, territory (wide vs central), crossing
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Box threat
86
Dribbling
77
Carrying
68
Press resistance ~proxy
67
Build-up
66
Transition ~proxy
63
Line-breaking
58
Ball-winning
56
Receiving zones
55
Retention
55
Creativity
53
Progression
49
Defensive aggression
47
Final-third threat
43
Passing directness
39
Through-balls ~proxy
35
Territory (wide vs central)
27
Crossing
23
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 193 cm / 86 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Florian Lejeune Rayo Vallecano · La Liga · 190 cm / 89 kg
74%
Driven by: box threat (22%), territory (wide vs central) (12%), crossing (12%). Different mechanism — Lejeune more via ball-winning, passing directness.
Tjark Scheller Paderborn · Bundesliga · 192 cm / 85 kg
71%
Driven by: crossing (18%), territory (wide vs central) (14%), build-up (12%). Different mechanism — Vuskovic more via through-balls, box threat; Scheller more via creativity.
Juma Bah Augsburg · Bundesliga · 195 cm / 80 kg
70%
Driven by: press resistance (17%), crossing (16%), dribbling (15%). Different mechanism — Vuskovic more via box threat, through-balls; Bah more via retention, passing directness.
Mariano Troilo Parma Calcio 1913 · Serie A · 191 cm / 86 kg
68%
Driven by: dribbling (20%), press resistance (17%), territory (wide vs central) (14%). Different mechanism — Vuskovic more via box threat, line-breaking; Troilo more via passing directness, crossing.
Willi Orbán RBL · Bundesliga · 186 cm / 87 kg
65%
Driven by: box threat (19%), press resistance (17%), crossing (11%). Different mechanism — Vuskovic more via line-breaking, ball-winning; Orbán more via passing directness, retention.
Jean-Philippe Gbamin Metz · Ligue 1 25/26 · 186 cm / 88 kg
65%
Driven by: dribbling (21%), press resistance (15%), box threat (12%). Different mechanism — Vuskovic more via box threat; Gbamin more via crossing, creativity.
20

Summary

Luka Vuskovic is a ball-playing centre-back: 89% pass completion, 57 line-breaking passes and 4.9 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 8 matches (742 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-playing centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report