العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026

Jon Gorrotxategi

Real Sociedad
Ball-winning 6 (destroyer) DM
12.9 defensive actions/90
defensive midtempo controllerpress resistancescreening
342
minutes
7 apps
232
passes
91% completed
91%
pass completion
232 passes
7
progressive passes
1.8/90
49
defensive actions
12.9/90
19
tackles + interceptions
78% tackle win
10
recoveries
2.6/90
8
line-breaking passes
2.1/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Jon Gorrotxategi has played 7 matches (342 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
drop between the centre-backs — mostly in the middle third (66% of his 232 passes)
91% completion · 232× in 7/7 matches
↓
ESCAPE PRESSURE
turn out of a tight central area
33% won · 3× in 2/7 matches
↓
PROGRESS CENTRAL
break a line through the middle
1.8 prog/90 · 8× in 5/7 matches
↓
SCREEN / WIN BALL
protect the back four
7.6 ball-wins/90 · 29× in 7/7 matches
↓
RECYCLE / PROGRESS
keep it ticking, feed the final third
3.7 f3-entries/90 · 14× in 5/7 matches
Signature: drop to receive → escape the press on the turn → progress centrally or recycle → screen the counter. Block the central lane and press his first touch to force him backwards.
15

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
33
passes / match
12.9
def actions / 90
1–82
pass range (matches)
7
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (1 at the low end, 82 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

08

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

57 tracked carries (15.0/90, 4 progressive, 426m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

4%19%5%5%2%2%14%9%12%4%5%4%11%5%
progressivelateral/short% of his 57 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 6m, longest 23m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
3Outside → Inside
43Inside → Inside
7Outside → Outside
4Inside → Outside
First (18)Second (16)Third (15)Fourth (8)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

9
tackle duels
7
won
2
beaten · 22%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 78%
OUTSIDE 22%
Tackle-duel location — 7 inside · 2 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
1 · 11%
Central
4 · 44%
Left Half-Space
2 · 22%
Left Wing
2 · 22%
Vision AI beaten in 2 of 9 tackle duels (22% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 3 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

03

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

3%
vertical passes
3×
3%
switches
3×
30%
carries
32×
65%
short circulation
70×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW2167%1419%414%3RHS6028%1735%2130%185%32%1C6910%729%2032%2222%157%5LHS5112%629%1531%1627%14LW1127%336%436%4FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the left half-space in the middle third → central areas in the final third — 2 progressive passes (20% of his progression) at 0.074 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 50% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 10% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 6% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 3 line-breaking passes and 14 final-third entries, -0.5 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%6%9%13%6%1%0%8%18%12%5%1%3%4%9%5%
completedincomplete232 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
232
passes
91%
completed
20
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 91% season completion rate.
09

How does he create chances?

2 key passes (0.53/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
50%50%
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
05

Where does he become vulnerable?

22 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

6
attacking third (cheap)
7
middle third
9
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 27% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.28 danger-index/90 · 0.394 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
04

What is his passing profile?

232
passes attempted
52%
mostly sideways
58%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
62 · 27%
Sideways
120 · 52%
Backward
50 · 22%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
124 · 58%
Medium
81 · 38%
Long (>30m)
7 · 3%
06

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Jon Gorrotxategi gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
22%
Primary
Central, Middle third
19%
Secondary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
16%
Third
Left Half-Space, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
07

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Jon Gorrotxategi actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
27921111194228113142230132
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%6%9%13%6%1%0%8%18%12%5%1%3%4%9%5%
own goal left, attacking →
10

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

2Key pass
7Progressive
8Long ball
5Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
14Outside → Inside
136Inside → Inside
18Outside → Outside
44Inside → Outside
By direction
62Forward
50Backward
120Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the right wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 2 passes worth 0.22 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 2 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the left hs toward the central, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the final third: 25% of his 8 touches there are lost (2 times).
—4 touches · too few15%2/13 lost18%3/17 lost—7 touches · too few—2 touches · too few7%1/14 lost2%1/45 lost10%5/50 lost0%0/38 lost—5 touches · too few25%2/8 lost—7 touches · too few0%0/10 lost—7 touches · too few—5 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

12

How & where does he defend?

49 defensive actions across the season (12.9/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
9
tackles · 78% won
10
interceptions · 2.6/90
10
recoveries · 2.6/90
7
clearances · 1.8/90
0
blocks
38
avg action height
9
won high (att 3rd)
18
middle third
22
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 29 proactive ball-wins (7.6/90), tackle success 78%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
11

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Jon Gorrotxategi still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-3 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 4.3, 2m)
88%
1.9
3.8
0.37
Mid press (PPDA 5.1, 2m)
95%
4.4
2.2
0.67
Low press (PPDA 8.5, 3m)
92%
1.3
1.3
0.93
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

13

Impact on the Team

Real Sociedad's output per match with Jon Gorrotxategi (7 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (7)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals against /match
1.57
2.33
-0.76
points /match
2.29
1.00
+1.29
goals for /match
2.14
1.33
+0.81
xG for /match
1.48
0.38
+1.10
14

His Share of the Team

Of everything Real Sociedad produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Jon Gorrotxategi specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
interceptions
12%
45 / 371
zone-14 entries
8%
23 / 277
ball recoveries
7%
135 / 1852
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

16

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 258 defensive mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Tempo controller56%Deep-lying playmaker52%Ball-winning 645%
Why Tempo controller 56%: a weighted blend of retention 58 (weight 35%) + build-up 62 (weight 30%) + press resistance 50 (weight 20%) + progression 38 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
—
Average
build-up, carrying, retention, receiving zones, ball-winning, transition, press resistance, creativity, crossing, dribbling, passing directness
Weak
defensive aggression, progression, final-third threat, territory (wide vs central), box threat, line-breaking, through-balls
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Build-up
62
Carrying
60
Retention
58
Receiving zones
56
Ball-winning
54
Transition ~proxy
52
Press resistance ~proxy
50
Creativity
45
Crossing
43
Dribbling
43
Passing directness
42
Defensive aggression
38
Progression
38
Final-third threat
38
Territory (wide vs central)
37
Box threat
25
Line-breaking
21
Through-balls ~proxy
16
17

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 177 cm / 74 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Tyler Adams Bournemouth · Premier League · 175 cm / 72 kg
76%
Driven by: through-balls (24%), box threat (23%), build-up (10%). Different mechanism — Gorrotxategi more via dribbling; Adams more via passing directness.
Lukasz Poreba Elversberg · Bundesliga · 179 cm / 76 kg
73%
Driven by: box threat (21%), line-breaking (15%), through-balls (14%). Different mechanism — Gorrotxategi more via receiving zones, territory (wide vs central); Poreba more via retention, press resistance.
Harry Winks Cagliari · Serie A · 178 cm / 65 kg
71%
Driven by: through-balls (20%), line-breaking (17%), box threat (13%). Different mechanism — Gorrotxategi more via carrying, territory (wide vs central); Winks more via retention, build-up.
Haris Belkebla Angers · Ligue 1 · 177 cm / 68 kg
71%
Driven by: box threat (21%), through-balls (17%), line-breaking (13%). Different mechanism — Gorrotxategi more via receiving zones, crossing; Belkebla more via dribbling, press resistance.
Morten Frendrup Genoa · Serie A · 178 cm / 63 kg
70%
Driven by: box threat (25%), line-breaking (12%), final-third threat (11%). Different mechanism — Gorrotxategi more via passing directness, final-third threat; Frendrup more via defensive aggression, through-balls.
André Wolves · Premier League 25/26 · 176 cm / 77 kg
68%
Driven by: box threat (26%), build-up (10%), line-breaking (10%). Different mechanism — Gorrotxategi more via carrying, receiving zones; André more via through-balls, retention.
18

Summary

Jon Gorrotxategi is a tempo controller: 91% completion, 8 line-breaks and 1.8 progressive passes /90, resisting pressure with 33% dribble success. A central controller. [Off-ball screening position and scanning need tracking data.]

Based on 7 matches (342 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a tempo controller — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall tempo controller profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report