العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLigue 1 2026

Khalis Merah

Lyon
Central midfielder CM
balanced central profile
central midtempo controllerprogressionbox-to-box
167
minutes
5 apps
2
progressive passes
1.1/90
87%
pass completion
61 passes
2
key passes
1.08/90
2
box entries
1.08/90
1
final-3rd entries
0.5/90
1
dribbles
0% won
9
possessions lost
1.58 danger/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Khalis Merah has played 5 matches (167 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Left Wing, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (59% of his 61 passes)
87% completion · 61× in 5/5 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
1.08 key passes /90 · 1 goals · 5× in 2/5 matches
Signature: Receive → Create / Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: progress — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); arrive — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

04

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

20 tracked carries (10.8/90, 2 progressive, 180m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

5%15%5%5%5%5%5%10%15%10%15%5%
progressivelateral/short% of his 20 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 33m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
2Outside → Inside
9Inside → Inside
6Outside → Outside
3Inside → Outside
First (20)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Only 1 dribble attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.

02

How does he create chances?

2 key passes (1.08/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
50%50%
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 2 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the middle third: 25% of his 8 touches there are lost (2 times).
—2 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—2 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—4 touches · too few25%2/8 lost—5 touches · too few0%0/8 lost—3 touches · too few0%0/12 lost—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—6 touches · too few—4 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

05

How & where does he defend?

29 defensive actions across the season (15.6/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
8
tackles · 50% won
5
interceptions · 2.7/90
1
recoveries · 0.5/90
3
clearances · 1.6/90
2
blocks
38
avg action height
4
won high (att 3rd)
10
middle third
15
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 14 proactive ball-wins (7.5/90), tackle success 50%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

06

Impact on the Team

Lyon's output per match with Khalis Merah (5 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (5)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals for /match
2.00
1.00
+1.00
xG for /match
1.60
0.69
+0.92
goals against /match
1.20
0.33
+0.87
points /match
1.80
1.67
+0.13
07

His Share of the Team

Of everything Lyon produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Khalis Merah specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
expected assists (xA)
9%
2.0 / 20.9
goals
9%
1 / 11
tackles
6%
35 / 557
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

08

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 383 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Tempo controller56%Deep-lying playmaker47%Transition runner36%Advanced playmaker (8)33%
Why Tempo controller 56%: a weighted blend of retention 70 (weight 35%) + press resistance 69 (weight 20%) + build-up 44 (weight 30%) + progression 21 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
—
Average
retention, press resistance, dribbling, carrying, defensive aggression, creativity, ball-winning, territory (wide vs central), build-up
Weak
crossing, transition, receiving zones, box threat, final-third threat, progression, through-balls, line-breaking, passing directness
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Retention
70
Press resistance ~proxy
69
Dribbling
68
Carrying
64
Defensive aggression
59
Creativity
57
Ball-winning
56
Territory (wide vs central)
55
Build-up
44
Crossing
37
Transition ~proxy
34
Receiving zones
34
Box threat
31
Final-third threat
27
Progression
21
Through-balls ~proxy
20
Line-breaking
8
Passing directness
3
09

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 178 cm) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Alpha Touré Metz 25/26 · 180 cm
79%
Driven by: passing directness (16%), line-breaking (15%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Merah more via creativity, territory (wide vs central); Touré more via build-up.
Mahdi Camara Rennes · 178 cm / 73 kg
77%
Driven by: passing directness (22%), through-balls (12%), press resistance (11%). Different mechanism — Camara more via line-breaking, progression.
Fisayo Dele-Bashiru Lazio · Serie A · 176 cm / 70 kg
73%
Driven by: passing directness (17%), line-breaking (14%), progression (12%). Different mechanism — Merah more via ball-winning, carrying; Dele-Bashiru more via retention.
Simon Sohm Venezia · Serie A · 188 cm / 85 kg
73%
Driven by: passing directness (15%), line-breaking (14%), through-balls (12%). Different mechanism — Merah more via ball-winning, territory (wide vs central); Sohm more via build-up.
Nelson Deossa Real Betis · La Liga · 185 cm / 71 kg
72%
Driven by: line-breaking (16%), through-balls (13%), press resistance (13%). Different mechanism — Deossa more via box threat, dribbling.
Warren Bondo Cremonese · Serie A 25/26 · 177 cm / 63 kg
71%
Driven by: line-breaking (14%), passing directness (14%), box threat (10%). Different mechanism — Merah more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression; Bondo more via build-up, retention.
10

Summary

Khalis Merah is a tempo controller: 1.1 progressive passes, 1.08 key passes /90, 2 box entries, 1 goals from 0.36 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.

Based on 5 matches (167 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a tempo controller — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall tempo controller profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report