Thin sample this season. Kareem Tunde has played 1 match (19 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Right Wing, Middle third — between the lines — mostly in the middle third (50% of his 2 passes)
50% completion · 2× in 1/1 matches
↓
TURN / BEAT MAN
face forward in the pocket
0% won · 1× in 1/1 matches
Signature: Receive → Turn / Beat Man — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: create — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); finish — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Levante's output per match with Kareem Tunde (1 matches) versus without him (9 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 9 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (1)
WITHOUT (9)
Δ
goals for /match
0.00
1.78
-1.78
xG for /match
0.19
0.00
+0.19
goals against /match
3.00
1.78
+1.22
points /match
0.00
1.11
-1.11
03
His Share of the Team
Of everything Levante produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Kareem Tunde specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
8%
15 / 184
shots
6%
21 / 373
interceptions
5%
15 / 302
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 247 attacking mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Half-space creator12%Advanced playmaker (8)10%
Why Half-space creator 12%: a weighted blend of dribbling 46 (weight 15%) + box threat 30 (weight 15%) + creativity 5 (weight 40%) + final-third threat 5 (weight 30%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
88
Defensive aggression
85
Ball-winning
81
Dribbling
46
Press resistance ~proxy
43
Build-up
42
Retention
39
Crossing
35
Box threat
30
Transition ~proxy
28
Passing directness
26
Through-balls ~proxy
20
Carrying
13
Line-breaking
9
Progression
8
Receiving zones
7
Final-third threat
5
Creativity
5
05
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 177 cm) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Brenden Aaronson Leeds · Premier League · 177 cm / 69 kg
91%
Driven by: creativity (16%), progression (13%), defensive aggression (13%). Different mechanism — Tunde more via territory (wide vs central); Aaronson more via final-third threat, crossing.
Daizen Maeda Ipswich · Premier League · 173 cm / 67 kg
82%
Driven by: creativity (14%), defensive aggression (11%), progression (10%). Different mechanism — Tunde more via territory (wide vs central), ball-winning.
Evann Guessand Crystal Palace · Premier League · 188 cm / 82 kg
81%
Driven by: progression (14%), final-third threat (14%), creativity (12%). Different mechanism — Tunde more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression; Guessand more via receiving zones, passing directness.
Benja Domínguez Sassuolo · Serie A · 172 cm / 68 kg
81%
Driven by: progression (13%), final-third threat (12%), defensive aggression (11%). Different mechanism — Tunde more via ball-winning, build-up; Domínguez more via receiving zones, creativity.
Mateo Joseph Mallorca 25/26 · 185 cm / 74 kg
80%
Driven by: creativity (14%), progression (14%), final-third threat (14%). Different mechanism — Tunde more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression; Joseph more via retention, box threat.
Brandon Thomas-Asante Coventry · Premier League · 182 cm / 72 kg
78%
Driven by: creativity (16%), defensive aggression (12%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Tunde more via build-up, crossing; Thomas-Asante more via passing directness, dribbling.
06
Summary
Kareem Tunde is a half-space creator: 0.00 key passes /90, 0.0 progressive passes, 0 goals from 0.00 xG. A between-the-lines creator. [Off-ball movement into pockets needs tracking.]
Based on 1 matches (19 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a half-space creator — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is creativity — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall half-space creator profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
