العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Ross Barkley

Aston Villa
Half-space creator CM
41% of actions in the half-spaces
central midtempo controllerprogressionbox-to-box
385
minutes
8 apps
15
progressive passes
3.5/90
89%
pass completion
227 passes
7
key passes
1.64/90
4
box entries
0.94/90
18
final-3rd entries
4.2/90
6
dribbles
67% won
28
possessions lost
2.58 danger/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Ross Barkley has played 8 matches (385 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Central, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (62% of his 227 passes)
89% completion · 227× in 8/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
3.5 prog/90 · 15× in 6/8 matches
↓
ARRIVE
get into the box late
7 key passes · 4× in 4/8 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
1.64 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 15× in 5/8 matches
Signature: receive → progress → arrive in the box → create or finish. A box-to-box midfielder judged across every phase.
19

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
28
passes / match
1.5
dribbles / match
4–104
pass range (matches)
1–2
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (4 at the low end, 104 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

08

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

61 tracked carries (14.3/90, 11 progressive, 620m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

5%8%2%3%15%28%5%2%10%13%8%2%
progressivelateral/short% of his 61 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 32m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
4Outside → Inside
52Inside → Inside
3Outside → Outside
2Inside → Outside
First (20)Second (16)Third (14)Fourth (11)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Only 6 dribbles attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.

09

How does he build & move the ball?

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW4100%4RHS1937%742%811%25%15%1C947%726%2439%3721%206%6LHS643%248%3127%1722%14LW205%120%475%15FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: central areas in the middle third → central areas in the middle third — 2 progressive passes (18% of his progression) at -0.001 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.

Inward (36%) and outward (27%) progression are balanced — no strong lane bias.

Only 6% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 5 line-breaking passes and 18 final-third entries, 0.4 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
0%1%1%4%4%0%7%15%22%7%0%2%3%6%13%11%1%
completedincomplete227 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
227
passes
89%
completed
26
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
05

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

15
progressive · 3.5/90
18
final-third entries · 4.2/90
4
box entries · 0.94/90
16
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
03

How does he create chances?

7 key passes (1.64/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
14%14%29%43%
chance creation (7)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
12

Where does he become vulnerable?

28 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

6
attacking third (cheap)
16
middle third
6
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 21% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.58 danger-index/90 · 0.395 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
13

What is his passing profile?

227
passes attempted
46%
mostly sideways
59%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
74 · 33%
Sideways
105 · 46%
Backward
48 · 21%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
119 · 59%
Medium
74 · 37%
Long (>30m)
8 · 4%
11

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.610.240.190.180.070.07
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.61
Central Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
3 passes · 3 to a shot
0.24
Central Mid third → Central Mid third
3 passes
0.19
Central Def third → Left Wing Mid third
2 passes · 1 to a shot
0.18
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
1 passes
0.07
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Half-Space Mid third
1 passes
0.07
Central Mid third → Left Half-Space Mid third
1 passes
06

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Ross Barkley gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
32%
Primary
Central, Middle third
15%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
10%
Third
Left Half-Space, Attacking third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
07

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Ross Barkley actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
571529282173452205134991
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

0%1%1%4%4%0%7%15%22%7%0%2%3%6%13%11%1%
own goal left, attacking →
14

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

7Key pass
15Progressive
7Long ball
4Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
5Outside → Inside
142Inside → Inside
19Outside → Outside
35Inside → Outside
By direction
74Forward
48Backward
105Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the central to the left hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 3 passes worth 0.61 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 7 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he switches it out from the central to the left hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 3 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the middle third: 31% of his 13 touches there are lost (4 times).
—1 touch · too few—4 touches · too few13%2/15 lost17%2/12 lost—1 touch · too few—3 touches · too few31%4/13 lost7%5/73 lost3%1/35 lost19%3/16 lost—1 touch · too few20%2/10 lost0%0/13 lost17%4/24 lost—6 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
04

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 61 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he carries through central areas (85%). He carries from outside into the middle 4 times and out toward the touchline 2 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
10

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
1 · 2%
Progressive / key pass
5 · 8%
Simple pass
52 · 85%
No clean link
3 · 5%
Of 61 carries, 2% flow straight into a shot of his own, 8% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 5% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

16

How & where does he defend?

60 defensive actions across the season (14.0/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
7
tackles · 71% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
21
recoveries · 4.9/90
5
clearances · 1.2/90
4
blocks
38
avg action height
9
won high (att 3rd)
18
middle third
33
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 28 proactive ball-wins (6.5/90), tackle success 71%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
15

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Ross Barkley keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 2.7, 2m)
0.87
1.1
2.14
100%
Mid press (PPDA 3.3, 2m)
0.86
4.5
4.50
0%
Low press (PPDA 5.1, 4m)
1.07
4.1
1.03
50%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

17

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Ross Barkley played nearly every Aston Villa match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

18

His Share of the Team

Of everything Aston Villa produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Ross Barkley specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
expected assists (xA)
6%
1.8 / 30.5
successful take-ons
5%
17 / 315
shots
5%
26 / 483
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

20

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 383 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Tempo controller82%Deep-lying playmaker76%Advanced playmaker (8)72%Transition runner63%
Why Tempo controller 82%: a weighted blend of retention 91 (weight 35%) + build-up 72 (weight 30%) + press resistance 89 (weight 20%) + progression 42 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
dribbling, retention, press resistance
Strong
creativity, receiving zones, carrying, box threat, build-up
Average
final-third threat, transition, passing directness, defensive aggression, progression
Weak
line-breaking, crossing, ball-winning, through-balls, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Dribbling
91
Retention
91
Press resistance ~proxy
89
Creativity
85
Receiving zones
82
Carrying
76
Box threat
72
Build-up
72
Final-third threat
62
Transition ~proxy
62
Passing directness
48
Defensive aggression
47
Progression
42
Line-breaking
39
Crossing
35
Ball-winning
32
Through-balls ~proxy
26
Territory (wide vs central)
2
21

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 189 cm / 76 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Felix Nmecha Borussia Dortmund · Bundesliga · 190 cm / 73 kg
83%
Driven by: press resistance (19%), territory (wide vs central) (16%), retention (14%). Different mechanism — Barkley more via creativity; Nmecha more via ball-winning, defensive aggression.
Ryan Gravenberch Liverpool · 190 cm / 83 kg
78%
Driven by: press resistance (17%), retention (14%), territory (wide vs central) (13%). Different mechanism — Barkley more via box threat, creativity; Gravenberch more via passing directness, ball-winning.
Assan Ouédraogo RBL · Bundesliga · 191 cm / 84 kg
78%
Driven by: press resistance (15%), territory (wide vs central) (12%), dribbling (11%). Different mechanism — Barkley more via line-breaking, build-up.
Khéphren Thuram Juventus · Serie A · 192 cm / 80 kg
76%
Driven by: press resistance (17%), dribbling (13%), retention (11%). Different mechanism — Barkley more via creativity; Thuram more via defensive aggression, ball-winning.
Vincent Marchetti Paris FC · Ligue 1 · 181 cm / 70 kg
76%
Driven by: press resistance (20%), retention (15%), dribbling (13%). Different mechanism — Barkley more via receiving zones, creativity.
Ismaël Koné Sassuolo · Serie A 25/26 · 188 cm / 76 kg
76%
Driven by: press resistance (20%), retention (17%), dribbling (12%). Different mechanism — Barkley more via creativity, defensive aggression; Koné more via territory (wide vs central).
22

Summary

Ross Barkley is a tempo controller / deep-lying playmaker: 3.5 progressive passes, 1.64 key passes /90, 4 box entries, 0 goals from 0.49 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.

Based on 8 matches (385 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a tempo controller / deep-lying playmaker — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall tempo controller profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report