Thin sample this season. Mateo Kovacic has played 3 matches (103 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Central, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (66% of his 105 passes)
95% completion · 105× in 3/3 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
6.1 prog/90 · 7× in 3/3 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
2.62 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 3× in 1/3 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress → Create / Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: arrive — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
10
Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?
Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.
own goal left, attacking →
35
passes / match
2.5
dribbles / match
26–49
pass range (matches)
2–3
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (26 at the low end, 49 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
23 tracked carries (20.1/90, 1 progressive, 205m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.
progressivelateral/short% of his 23 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 26m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (23)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Dribbles (1v1s)
Only 5 dribbles attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.
02
How does he create chances?
3 key passes (2.62/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (3)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
04
Where Does He Receive?
The zones where Mateo Kovacic gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
24%
Primary
Central, Middle third
16%
Secondary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
15%
Third
Right Wing, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
05
Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone
Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Mateo Kovacic actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.
Filter:
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches
Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone
Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.
own goal left, attacking →
07
Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete
Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 3 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the right hs in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the final third: 15% of his 13 touches there are lost (2 times).
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Man City's output per match with Mateo Kovacic (3 matches) versus without him (5 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 5 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (3)
WITHOUT (5)
Δ
goals for /match
3.00
2.20
+0.80
xG for /match
2.17
1.48
+0.68
goals against /match
1.33
1.00
+0.33
points /match
3.00
2.40
+0.60
09
His Share of the Team
Of everything Man City produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Mateo Kovacic specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
expected assists (xA)
1%
0.6 / 44.8
zone-14 entries
1%
8 / 611
half-space entries
1%
28 / 2422
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 433 central mids in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Line-breaking
100
Receiving zones
100
Progression
99
Creativity
98
Carrying
98
Retention
97
Final-third threat
93
Dribbling
93
Transition ~proxy
93
Press resistance ~proxy
92
Passing directness
86
Build-up
75
Through-balls ~proxy
72
Crossing
54
Defensive aggression
50
Ball-winning
43
Box threat
29
Territory (wide vs central)
11
12
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 177 cm / 78 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Nicolò Fagioli Fiorentina · Serie A · 178 cm / 71 kg
93%
Driven by: creativity (13%), transition (11%), press resistance (10%). Different mechanism — Kovacic more via progression; Fagioli more via box threat, ball-winning.
Vitinha PSG · Ligue 1 · 172 cm / 64 kg
93%
Driven by: transition (13%), retention (10%), press resistance (10%). Different mechanism — Kovacic more via dribbling, creativity; Vitinha more via box threat.
Angelo Stiller Stuttgart · Bundesliga · 183 cm / 77 kg
91%
Driven by: transition (11%), creativity (11%), progression (10%). Different mechanism — Kovacic more via dribbling, press resistance.
Joshua Kimmich Bayern · Bundesliga · 177 cm / 75 kg
90%
Driven by: progression (11%), transition (11%), receiving zones (10%). Different mechanism — Kovacic more via dribbling, press resistance; Kimmich more via box threat, through-balls.
Piotr Zielinski Inter · Serie A · 180 cm / 76 kg
90%
Driven by: transition (12%), retention (10%), press resistance (10%). Different mechanism — Kovacic more via dribbling, creativity; Zielinski more via box threat.
Pedri Barcelona · La Liga · 174 cm / 68 kg
90%
Driven by: press resistance (11%), transition (11%), creativity (11%). Different mechanism — Pedri more via ball-winning, defensive aggression.
13
Summary
Mateo Kovacic is a deep-lying playmaker / tempo controller: 6.1 progressive passes, 2.62 key passes /90, 0 box entries, 0 goals from 0.00 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.
Based on 3 matches (103 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a deep-lying playmaker / tempo controller — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is build-up — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall deep-lying playmaker profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.