العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Trey Nyoni

Liverpool
Ball-winning 6 (destroyer) DM
16.7 defensive actions/90
defensive midtempo controllerpress resistancescreening
178
minutes
6 apps
97
passes
88% completed
88%
pass completion
97 passes
8
progressive passes
4.0/90
33
defensive actions
16.7/90
9
tackles + interceptions
25% tackle win
4
recoveries
2.0/90
5
line-breaking passes
2.5/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Trey Nyoni has played 6 matches (178 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
drop between the centre-backs — mostly in the middle third (59% of his 97 passes)
88% completion · 97× in 6/6 matches
↓
PROGRESS CENTRAL
break a line through the middle
4.0 prog/90 · 5× in 3/6 matches
↓
SCREEN / WIN BALL
protect the back four
6.6 ball-wins/90 · 13× in 6/6 matches
↓
RECYCLE / PROGRESS
keep it ticking, feed the final third
3.0 f3-entries/90 · 6× in 4/6 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress Central → Screen / Win Ball → Recycle / Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: escape pressure — 1× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

04

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

20 tracked carries (10.1/90, 3 progressive, 180m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

10%5%5%5%25%10%5%5%10%10%10%
progressivelateral/short% of his 20 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 17m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
4Outside → Inside
13Inside → Inside
2Outside → Outside
1Inside → Outside
First (20)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

4
tackle duels
1
won
3
beaten · 75%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 75%
OUTSIDE 25%
Tackle-duel location — 3 inside · 1 outside
Right Wing
1 · 25%
Right Half-Space
2 · 50%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
1 · 25%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 3 of 4 tackle duels (75% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 1 dribble of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

03

How does he create chances?

1 key passes (0.51/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
100%
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the middle third: 31% of his 16 touches there are lost (5 times).
—4 touches · too few0%0/8 lost—3 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—2 touches · too few—3 touches · too few31%5/16 lost0%0/21 lost13%2/15 lost—2 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—7 touches · too few10%1/10 lost—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

06

How & where does he defend?

33 defensive actions across the season (16.7/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
4
tackles · 25% won
5
interceptions · 2.5/90
4
recoveries · 2.0/90
9
clearances · 4.6/90
2
blocks
35
avg action height
2
won high (att 3rd)
14
middle third
17
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 13 proactive ball-wins (6.6/90), tackle success 25%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
05

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Trey Nyoni still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 3.3, 2m)
94%
4.7
0.0
0.45
Mid press (PPDA 4.6, 2m)
84%
3.0
4.0
0.78
Low press (PPDA 6.7, 2m)
92%
5.8
2.9
1.31
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

07

Impact on the Team

Liverpool's output per match with Trey Nyoni (6 matches) versus without him (2 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 2 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (6)
WITHOUT (2)
Δ
goals against /match
1.00
1.00
+0.00
points /match
2.17
1.00
+1.17
goals for /match
1.50
1.00
+0.50
xG for /match
1.19
2.35
-1.16
08

His Share of the Team

Of everything Liverpool produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Trey Nyoni specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
interceptions
2%
5 / 314
tackles
1%
5 / 581
clearances
1%
9 / 1046
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

09

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 300 defensive mids in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Tempo controller50%Deep-lying playmaker47%Ball-winning 641%
Why Tempo controller 50%: a weighted blend of retention 65 (weight 35%) + build-up 51 (weight 30%) + progression 49 (weight 15%) + press resistance 34 (weight 20%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
line-breaking
Average
box threat, passing directness, retention, receiving zones, build-up, progression, ball-winning
Weak
defensive aggression, transition, creativity, press resistance, final-third threat, carrying, territory (wide vs central), crossing, through-balls, dribbling
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Line-breaking
80
Box threat
68
Passing directness
67
Retention
65
Receiving zones
57
Build-up
51
Progression
49
Ball-winning
43
Defensive aggression
37
Transition ~proxy
36
Creativity
36
Press resistance ~proxy
34
Final-third threat
29
Carrying
25
Territory (wide vs central)
25
Crossing
13
Through-balls ~proxy
8
Dribbling
2
10

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 180 cm / 75 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Everton Pereira Nice · Ligue 1 · 181 cm / 64 kg
61%
Driven by: crossing (20%), dribbling (19%), through-balls (10%). Different mechanism — Nyoni more via line-breaking, receiving zones; Pereira more via defensive aggression.
Zento Uno Borussia Monchengladbach · Bundesliga · 176 cm / 72 kg
61%
Driven by: crossing (20%), dribbling (18%), through-balls (12%). Different mechanism — Nyoni more via line-breaking, retention; Uno more via defensive aggression.
Andrey Santos Man Utd · 180 cm / 75 kg
57%
Driven by: dribbling (34%), crossing (16%), territory (wide vs central) (14%). Different mechanism — Nyoni more via line-breaking, territory (wide vs central); Santos more via build-up, receiving zones.
Izan Merino Malaga · La Liga · 182 cm / 74 kg
56%
Driven by: dribbling (23%), crossing (20%), through-balls (12%). Different mechanism — Nyoni more via box threat, ball-winning; Merino more via build-up, creativity.
Niko Sigur Toulouse · Ligue 1 · 180 cm / 77 kg
55%
Driven by: crossing (25%), dribbling (18%), through-balls (15%). Different mechanism — Nyoni more via passing directness, box threat; Sigur more via territory (wide vs central).
Yannik Keitel Augsburg · Bundesliga · 186 cm / 84 kg
54%
Driven by: dribbling (19%), crossing (15%), through-balls (12%). Different mechanism — Nyoni more via line-breaking, box threat; Keitel more via passing directness.
11

Summary

Trey Nyoni is a tempo controller: 88% completion, 5 line-breaks and 4.0 progressive passes /90, resisting pressure with 0% dribble success. A central controller. [Off-ball screening position and scanning need tracking data.]

Based on 6 matches (178 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a tempo controller — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is press resistance — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall tempo controller profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report