His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
Signature: Link → Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: receive / move — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); convert — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
6 tracked carries (2.3/90, 2 progressive, 69m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.
progressivelateral/short% of his 6 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 11m, longest 22m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (6)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Dribbles (1v1s)
Does he drop to link or stay central? Touches by channel. Season rate: 4.29 dribbles attempted /90.
brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 27%
OUTSIDE 73%
Dribble location — 3 inside · 8 outside
Right Wing
1 · 9%
Right Half-Space
1 · 9%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
2 · 18%
Left Wing
7 · 64%
Vision AI His touches are spread wide — a roaming forward.
02
How does he create chances?
2 key passes (0.78/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (0)from the right (2)of 2 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
03
Where does he become vulnerable?
24 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.
10
attacking third (cheap)
14
middle third
0
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 42% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.34 danger-index/90 · 0.250 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
28 defensive actions across the season (10.9/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
3
tackles · 67% won
1
interceptions · 0.4/90
6
recoveries · 2.3/90
0
clearances · 0.0/90
1
blocks
61
avg action height
11
won high (att 3rd)
12
middle third
5
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 10 proactive ball-wins (3.9/90), tackle success 67%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
Defensive work in the attacking half
Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.
19
attacking-half actions · 7.40/90
05
Against Different Pressing Intensities
Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Rémi Himbert keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.
press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 4.8, 2m)
0.00
0.0
0.00
0%
Mid press (PPDA 6.2, 2m)
0.35
0.9
1.76
60%
Low press (PPDA 8.5, 4m)
0.04
0.0
0.00
20%
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Lyon's output per match with Rémi Himbert (2 matches) versus without him (6 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 6 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (2)
WITHOUT (6)
Δ
goals for /match
1.00
1.83
-0.83
xG for /match
0.81
1.57
-0.76
goals against /match
1.00
0.83
+0.17
points /match
1.50
1.83
-0.33
08
His Share of the Team
Of everything Lyon produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Rémi Himbert specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
goals
2%
1 / 65
shots
1%
10 / 740
expected goals (xG)
1%
0.9 / 86.2
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 354 strikers in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Why Pressing forward 79%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 77 (weight 45%) + ball-winning 76 (weight 30%) + transition 53 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
passing directness
Strong
defensive aggression, dribbling, ball-winning, territory (wide vs central)
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
100
Defensive aggression
77
Dribbling
76
Ball-winning
76
Territory (wide vs central)
70
Box threat
63
Receiving zones
59
Transition ~proxy
53
Line-breaking
47
Press resistance ~proxy
45
Creativity
37
Progression
32
Carrying
32
Final-third threat
26
Retention
15
Through-balls ~proxy
14
Build-up
12
Crossing
11
10
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 178 cm) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Mateo Pellegrino Fiorentina · Serie A · 192 cm / 80 kg
70%
Driven by: passing directness (21%), crossing (19%), build-up (18%). Different mechanism — Himbert more via ball-winning, box threat; Pellegrino more via build-up.
Nelson Weiper Mainz · Bundesliga 25/26 · 191 cm / 82 kg
70%
Driven by: passing directness (20%), defensive aggression (20%), crossing (18%). Different mechanism — Himbert more via ball-winning, box threat; Weiper more via through-balls, carrying.
Toni Martínez Alaves · La Liga · 187 cm / 83 kg
68%
Driven by: retention (22%), passing directness (20%), defensive aggression (16%). Different mechanism — Himbert more via dribbling, ball-winning; Martínez more via crossing, through-balls.
Paul Mendy Cagliari · Serie A
67%
Driven by: crossing (26%), through-balls (14%), defensive aggression (13%). Different mechanism — Himbert more via territory (wide vs central), passing directness; Mendy more via retention, creativity.
Carlos Espí Real Madrid · La Liga · 194 cm / 90 kg
65%
Driven by: build-up (17%), defensive aggression (11%), crossing (11%). Different mechanism — Himbert more via territory (wide vs central), passing directness; Espí more via retention, through-balls.
Kike García Espanyol · La Liga 25/26 · 186 cm / 79 kg
64%
Driven by: build-up (21%), defensive aggression (18%), crossing (17%). Different mechanism — Himbert more via passing directness, receiving zones.
11
Summary
Rémi Himbert is a pressing forward / transition runner: 1 goals from 0.93 xG (+0.07 vs expected), 10 shots, 0 box entries. A clinical finisher. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]
Based on 8 matches (231 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a pressing forward / transition runner — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall pressing forward profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.